Our DC (granted, not in the US!) charges a one-off fee of $75 to install the
XC, which includes the cable too. Terminated to a 1U patch panel at TOR. Only
one end pays the 1-off charge (the customer that requested the order). No
ongoing charges. No one else rummages in the overheads other than
On 16/Jun/16 16:38, Randy Bush wrote:
> i am aware of that. my point was that cache purge default might better
> be set to cache refresh interval than 60 secs.
I would agree with (and in fact, prefer) this protocol.
Mark.
On 16/Jun/16 21:36, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> Hi
>
> If I need to speak BGP with a customer that only has 1G I will simply make
> a MPLS L2VPN to one of my edge routers. We use the ZTE 5952E switch with
> 48x 1G plus 4x 10G for the L2VPN end point. If that is not enough the ZTE
> 8900 platform wi
On 16/Jun/16 22:27, Saku Ytti wrote:
> I'm not saying it's bad solution, I know lot of people do it. But I
> think people only do it, because L3 at port isn't offered by vendors
> at lower rates.
A lot of people did it because because there really wasn't a cheap,
dense solution until about 2010
On 16/Jun/16 23:24, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> The ZTE 5952E (routing switch) can do L3VPN including BGP. But it is
> limited to about 30k routes. It is usable if the customer wants a default
> route solution, but not if he wants the full default free zone.
Might be worthwhile to ask ZTE to devel
>> i am aware of that. my point was that cache purge default might
>> better be set to cache refresh interval than 60 secs.
>
> I would agree with (and in fact, prefer) this protocol.
i remembered wrongly
RFC6810
A client SHOULD delete the data from a cache when it has been unable
to ref
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
What Randy just wrote is exactly the point I was trying to make in my last
email. Some real estate facility owners/managers have got into the mistaken
mindset that they can get the greatest value and the most monthly revenue
from the square-footage of thei
On 18 June 2016 at 13:07, Mark Tinka wrote:
> > Our PoPs are connected in a ring topology (actually multiple rings). If a
> > link goes down somewhere, or an intermediate device crashes, the L2VPN
> will
> > reconfigure and find another path.
>
> Which is what would happen anyway with your IGP if
On 18 June 2016 at 13:04, Mark Tinka wrote:
> We push IP/MPLS all the way into the Metro-E Access using a team of
> Cisco ASR920's and ME3600X's. The value of being able to instantiate an
> IP service or BGP session directly in the Metro-E Access simplifies
> network operations a great deal for u
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, cidr-rep...@potaroo.net wrote:
TOP 20 Unstable Prefixes
Rank Prefix Upds % Origin AS -- AS Name
1 - 202.65.32.0/2128086 0.8% AS10131 -- CKTELECOM-CK-AP Telecom Cook
Islands, CK
2 - 110.170.17.0/24 21868 0.7% AS134438 -- AIRAAIFUL-AS-AP Aira & Ai
You did.
--
"Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by
its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole
life believing that it is stupid."
--Albert Einstein
From Larry's Cox account.
> On 19 Jun 2016, at 6:05 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, cidr-rep...@potaroo.net wrote:
>
>>
>> TOP 20 Unstable Prefixes
>> Rank Prefix Upds % Origin AS -- AS Name
>> 1 - 202.65.32.0/2128086 0.8% AS10131 -- CKTELECOM-CK-AP Telecom Cook
>> Islands
HI,
I was reading the following article:
http://www.lightreading.com/optical/sedona-boasts-multilayer-network-orchestrator/d/d-id/714616
It says that "The IP layer and optical layer are run like two separate
kingdoms," Wellingstein says. "Two separate kings manage the IP and optical
networks. The
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Glen Kent wrote:
Can somebody shed more light on what it means to say that the IP and
optical layers are run as independent kingdoms and why do ISPs need to
over-provision?
You have a group that runs fiber+dwdm+sonet(or SDH). You have another
group that runs IP. When the
> You have a group that runs fiber+dwdm+sonet(or SDH). You have another
> group that runs IP. When the IP guys ask "please tell us how the optical
> network is designed, and can we coordinate how they're built and btw, we
> want to put DWDM optics in our routers", the answer from the
> fiber+dw
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016, at 12:43, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Last I checked you can't commit/replace configuration in VRP. Has this
> changed? Can you give it full new config and expect it to figure out
> how to apply the new config without breaking existing?
... later...
> Yeah it's best I've seen. 8-10k
Looking at some sites and hearing chatter of a pretty wide scale AT&T
outage in the Austin and surrounding areas. I have two 10Gs one fed out of
Pflugerville, TX and one out of Austin, TX with PE's in Austin, TX and San
Antonio, TX. Both dropped at the same time and are on diverse fiber routes
and
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 01:04:49PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> Centralizing is just horrible, but that's just me. The goal is to make
> all these unreliable boxes work together to offer a reliable service to
> your customers, so making them too inter-dependent on each other has the
> potential to
Mikael,
Thanks. I was looking at a technical problem. I say this because you may
not have this problem when both are networks are being run by the same
vendor equipment, say Alcatel-Lucent (or Nokia now). What are the technical
problems because of which ISPs need to over-provision when there are I
19 matches
Mail list logo
