Is anyone from the Canadian Internet Registration Authority (CIRA) monitoring
the list? I was hoping they can ping me off list. I have a few questions
around there policy's and a program we would like to put in place.
Cheers
Ryan
To provide some additional clarity and detail:
1. No, you can’t to the best of my knowledge hand out any IPv6
parameters via IPv4, nor should you really want to.
2. You can hand out IPv6 DNS resolver information from either or both
of SLAAC and DHCPv6.
For SLAAC
"Is there a reason you use DHCPv6 and SLAAC? Is it for compatibility? Can I
use the DHCPv4 to give out DNSv6 addresses?"
Unless you plan om having IPv6 only hosts, there is no advantage in
providing IPv6 DNS servers. Just stay with IPv4 for your DNS resolver in
the DHCPv4 config. Notice that your
Please find my replies inline. Thanks for your time!
> hi nikolai
>
> - oops.. this got long based on my experiences/opinions :-)
>
> On 07/10/16 at 09:53pm, Nikolai Petrov wrote:
>
>> We are moving to our new offices in two months and I have access to the
>> building already.
>> My task is to
Hello! I have replied to you inline!
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Nikolai Petrov wrote:
>
>> I thought of taking the chance to remove some
>> "technical debt" and make everything from
>> scratch again.
>
> Hi Nikolai,
>
> This is a rookie mistake. Every in-place system encodes business
Here are my replies on this e-mail. Sorry for the late replies!
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:53:52 +0300, Nikolai Petrov said:
>
>> 1. Currently we do not have IPv6 in our network but I have seen the ISP is
>> giving us a "/56 Block" which from what I understand is a couple hundred "/64
>> Subnets".
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:30:11 +0300, Nikolai Petrov said:
> Is there any way to limit the amount of devices in a subnet to avoid problems
> and attacks? I don't think the equipment will work with 2^64 devices in a
> single subnet..
Sure. Just don't connect that many devices to one subnet, just the
Foul language is frowned upon.
https://www.nanog.org/list
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of James Bensley
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 4:24 AM
To: nanog
Subject: Re: IX in Iran by TIC
On 12 July 2016 at 14:36, Bevan Slattery wrote:
>
Is there an admin from the softlayer network ?We're experiencing
routing issues getting traffic to the softlayer network.
On 12 July 2016 at 14:36, Bevan Slattery wrote:
> EXAMPLE 1.
> There maybe for example an enterprise that is looking for a service
> provider in a facility (XYZ in NY for example) but that provider actually
> "peers" their transit routers at the ABC facility down the street. Because
> the provid
On 12 July 2016 at 14:36, Bevan Slattery wrote:
> EXAMPLE 1.
> There maybe for example an enterprise that is looking for a service
> provider in a facility (XYZ in NY for example) but that provider actually
> "peers" their transit routers at the ABC facility down the street. Because
> the provid
11 matches
Mail list logo
