RFC6598 in AWS?

2016-08-04 Thread Arlington Albertson
Hey folks, We've filed a support ticket to find out the supported level for this range, but I wanted to see if there was anyone out there who'd experienced using the 100.64.0.0/10 space in AWS? Thanks, -AA

Re: Host.us DDOS attack -and- related conversations

2016-08-04 Thread Christopher Morrow
"it's good that there aren't any easy solutions to this sort of problem..." On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Robert Webb wrote: > Looks like ATL01 is down again hard. > > Although, as someone else mentioned earlier, IPv6 seems to be just fine. > > Robert > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Phil

Re: Host.us DDOS attack -and- related conversations

2016-08-04 Thread Robert Webb
Looks like ATL01 is down again hard. Although, as someone else mentioned earlier, IPv6 seems to be just fine. Robert On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Phil Gardner wrote: > One of my VPS with them is in Atlanta, and while the IPv4 address is > unresponsive, the IPv6 address is working without i

Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology

2016-08-04 Thread Hugo Slabbert
On Thu 2016-Aug-04 08:20:58 +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: On 3/Aug/16 18:11, jim deleskie wrote: I struggled with this whole SDN/NVF/insert marketing term for a while at first, until I sat down and actually though about. When I strip away all the foo, what I'm left with is breaking things down

Re: Host.us DDOS attack -and- related conversations

2016-08-04 Thread Phil Gardner
One of my VPS with them is in Atlanta, and while the IPv4 address is unresponsive, the IPv6 address is working without issue. On 08/03/2016 11:08 AM, Soon Keat Neo wrote: > Back on topic about HostUS, I've been following a thread on LowEndTalk > where seemingly Alexander's been updating ( > https