A few of our exchange IPs get blocked intermittently, but only by ATT. Ips are
clean, no issues, we’re diligent about finding and fixing these types of issues
as it has a large impact.
It would be very helpful to know why the IP below got blocked so we can find
and fix the problem to prevent fu
Do you know any good IPv4 broker?
I need a /20.
Regards
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:50:03PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:39:10 -0700, Owen DeLong said:
>
> > I run a pair of nameservers. Let???s call them ns1.company.com
> > and ns2.company.com
>
> > Someone registers example.com and points NS records in the COM zone a
Check the archive, this issue has been covered
Also, if you need a ddos scrubber that will fail when your uplink is
saturated, that info is in the archives too
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016, Lorenzo Mainardi <
lorenzo.maina...@digitelitalia.com> wrote:
> Do you know any good IPv4 broker?
> I need
* o...@delong.com (Owen DeLong) [Wed 31 Aug 2016, 01:47 CEST]:
You don’t get NXDOMAIN when a nameserver gets a request for a zone
it doesn’t serve.
Correct in most cases (there's an edge case where a server is [mis]
configured as authoritative with its own empty . and its regular
zones and al
Interestingly, your mail to the nanog list went to my spam folder, rather
than my nanog folder (I'm using gmail or domains for my mail.) That rarely
happens.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Webhosting.net Admin
wrote:
> A few of our exchange IPs get blocked intermittently, but only by ATT. Ips
Gmail here, went to my Inbox.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Jay Farrell via NANOG
wrote:
> Interestingly, your mail to the nanog list went to my spam folder, rather
> than my nanog folder (I'm using gmail or domains for my mail.) That rarely
> happens.
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:22 AM, We
Hi Lorenzo,
you can see:
https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-transfers-and-mergers/
transfers/brokers
Ciao,
Marco Paesani
Skype: mpaesani
Mobile: +39 348 6019349
Success depends on the right choice !
Email: ma...@paesani.it
2016-08-30 17:43 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo Mainardi <
lorenzo.
Try posting that to the mailop list.
I had been having trouble with att.net for about a month, and I filled out
the form at http://att.net/blocks/ 3 times with no response.
I posted to mailop a few days ago and they resolved the issue within an
hour.
...then a few days later I received the respon
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Royce Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>>
>> http://www.percya.com/2016/08/chinese-ca-wosign-faces-revocation.html
>>
>> One of the largest Chinese root certificate authority WoSign issued many
>> fake certificates due to an vu
https://www.arbornetworks.com/blog/asert/rio-olympics-take-gold-540gbsec-sustained-ddos-attacks/
I've used SP Peakflow before and I have my opinions. With all the
intelligence out there about DDoS attacks, DDoS attackers, DDoS tools and
techniques this article leaves me with ton's of questions.
I
Hi Lorenzo,
You can obtain a last /22 from the RIPE region as long as you comply
with their policy, yes, even if you are "in" the United States.
http://bit.ly/RIPE22-20160831
That reduces your need and spend, unless you already received it.
Then use the link Marco posted. It
t;in" the United States.
>
> http://bit.ly/RIPE22-20160831
>
> That reduces your need and spend, unless you already received it.
>
> Then use the link Marco posted. It's a good list.
>
> And reference the archives as Cameron noted.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Julien.
>
>
>
> > On Aug 31, 2016, at 4:26 PM, Martin Hannigan > <mailto:hanni...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Lorenzo,
> >
> > You can obtain a last /22 from the RIPE region as long as you comply
> > with their policy, yes, even
if you want to use it in US.
>
> Julien.
>
>
>
> > On Aug 31, 2016, at 4:26 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> >
> > Hi Lorenzo,
> >
> > You can obtain a last /22 from the RIPE region as long as you comply
> > with their policy, yes, even if you are "in&qu
Hi all,
as part of our academic effort to devise more powerful routing services at
Internet eXchange Points (IXPs), we aim to understand the privacy
considerations of network operators in the context of peering with other
networks, in general, and at IXPs in particular.
We created a short surve
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:45:48AM -0800, Royce Williams wrote:
> Hypothetically, it would be an interesting strategy for a CA to
> publicly demonstrate this level of competence:
>
> https://www.schrauger.com/the-story-of-how-wosign-gave-me-an-ssl-certificate-for-github-com
>
> ... while at the s
"Too big to fail"
Where have we heard that before?
If business risk/continuity people knew not only how much of a single point
of failure a root CA is, but other basic stuff like "Maybe it shouldn't be
possible to login to your domain registrar's control panel with the
password known by Bob from
> On Aug 31, 2016, at 6:36 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
>
> Thanks, Netscape. Great ecosystem you built.
Nobody at that time had a clue how this environment was going to scale, let
alone what the wide-ranging security issues would be.
And where were you back then, not saving us from our erroneous
In message , Lyndon Nerenberg
writes:
> > On Aug 31, 2016, at 6:36 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Netscape. Great ecosystem you built.
>
> Nobody at that time had a clue how this environment was going to scale,
> let alone what the wide-ranging security issues would be.
>
> And where we
> On Aug 31, 2016, at 6:36 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
>
> there's just wy too many sites using WoSign (and StartCom) for the
> CAs' roots to just be pulled. Sad, but true.
Not even. Pull away.
> I'd be surprised if most business continuity people could even name their
> cert provider, and m
the Geo Localisation issue if you want to use it in US.
>>
>> Julien.
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 31, 2016, at 4:26 PM, Martin Hannigan >> <mailto:hanni...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Lorenzo,
>>>
>>> You can obtain a l
22 matches
Mail list logo
