Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?

2016-09-28 Thread larrysheldon
Alain Hebert wrote: > Do not forget the "NRA" ways. I do not understand the "NRA" reference.

Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?

2016-09-28 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:44:35 -, "White, Andrew" said: > This assumes the ISP manages the customer's CPE or home router, which is > often not the case. Adding such ACLs to the upstream device, operated by the > ISP, is not always easy or feasible. Hopefully, if you've been burnt by this, you r

Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?

2016-09-28 Thread Zbyněk Pospíchal
Dne 27.09.16 v 16:30 Mikael Abrahamsson napsal(a): > The first page was completely devoid of any real technical information > until I found the PDF (which from the color choice doesn't even look > like a link). (https://www.nix.cz/cs/file/NIX_RULES_FENIX) > > It's still not obvious what the FENIX

Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?

2016-09-28 Thread Nick Hilliard
Mike Hammett wrote: > Is that common in CMTSes or just in certain ones? it's a mandatory part of the docsis3 specification. Nick

Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?

2016-09-28 Thread Mike Hammett
IPv6? Is that common in CMTSes or just in certain ones? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Wesley George" To: "Mike Hammett" Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, Septe

Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?

2016-09-28 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article you write: >What would it take to test for BCP38 for a specific AS? Well, if a certain browser vendor let the browser deduce the external IP address, then send out a UDP DNS PTR query for .in-addr.browser-vendor.com to say, a large DNS resolving cluster they also happen to be running

Re: CDN Overload?

2016-09-28 Thread Blake Hudson
Mike, you might want to reference this thread - http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2016-July/thread.html#87147 - as another data point. LLNW was sending data at levels ~ 10x greater than my policed DSL user's subscription rates. It seems to me that either the client or the server TCP stac

Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?

2016-09-28 Thread Wesley George
At least as far as cable is concerned, there is already configuration on the CMTS (e.g. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/broadband-cable/cable-security/20691-source-verify.html ) that

Re: Krebs on Security booted off Akamai network after DDoS attack proves pricey

2016-09-28 Thread Stephen Satchell
On 09/28/2016 12:33 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: It's not just consumers that need to understand this. Manufacturers of Things are right now on a steep learning curve. Consider that thermostat, for just a moment. In The Gold Old Days, before it had a network interface, the manufacturer cared about a

Re: BCP38 adoption "incentives"?

2016-09-28 Thread Alain Hebert
Do not forget the "NRA" ways. Circular discussions every time an event arise, let it die out after a few days, and hopefully, nothing change. - Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield,

Re: Krebs on Security booted off Akamai network after DDoS attack proves pricey

2016-09-28 Thread Eliot Lear
It's not just consumers that need to understand this. Manufacturers of Things are right now on a steep learning curve. Consider that thermostat, for just a moment. In The Gold Old Days, before it had a network interface, the manufacturer cared about a handful of things like at what temperature t