Re: Distributed Object Architecture versus DNS

On 7 Jan 2017, at 14:22, Joly MacFie wrote: > Blind backlash from IoT DDoS? Looming billions of rf tagged items​? None of this has anything to do with this 'DOA' thing, though. --- Roland Dobbins

Re: Distributed Object Architecture versus DNS

On 7 Jan 2017, at 10:15, Joly MacFie wrote: They are worried (as I understand it) 1) that it could be an ITU end run to grab back numbering, 2) it could be abused by bad actors such as repressive governments who want to use it for digital id. Based on seemingly cyclical statements of this

Re: Distributed Object Architecture versus DNS

On 7 Jan 2017, at 4:15, Stephenson, Ryan M CIV DISA IE (US) wrote: Does anyone have any information about DOA versus DNS. My understanding of 'DOA' is that it's a general category of software architecture (think CORBA) and nothing to do with name resolution or any sort of directory

FTC sues D-Link over router and camera security flaws

https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/blog/ftc-sues-d-link-over-router-and-camera-security-flaws That escalated quickly... -- Kyle Drake Neocities.org

Distributed Object Architecture versus DNS

Does anyone have any information about DOA versus DNS. Any ideas about security with DOA is better than DNS. Maybe pros and cons of DOA versus DNS? Matt Lewis smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: SoCal FIOS outage(?) / static IP readdressing

It is interesting to see the differences. For instance to put my unit in bridge mode I just logged into it, said bridge mode, and rebooted it. That method was actually documented in their business class FAQ. I'm sure there are great differences in plant and capabilities. There's a lot of M

Re: SoCal FIOS outage(?) / static IP readdressing

On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:55:56 -0800 Owen wrote: OD> > On Jan 6, 2017, at 08:21 , Leo Bicknell wrote: OD> > At a past address I had Comcast Business (cable modem) service at OD> > a residential address, and then later downgraded it to Comcast OD> > Residential service. OD> > [...]

Re: SoCal FIOS outage(?) / static IP readdressing

> On Jan 6, 2017, at 08:21 , Leo Bicknell wrote: > > In a message written on Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:51:26PM -0800, Paul B. Henson > wrote: >> I'd call my business FIOS "prosumer" ;). Honestly, I'm not sure why >> you'd get business FIOS over residential FIOS if you don't

NOC contact at IX Reach AS43531

Hi all, Sorry for the noise - just after a NOC contact at AS43531 if there are any on-list. We're observing a routing issue at Equinix IX Silicon Valley, and need some insight from their side. Emails to NOC have gone unresponded to for a few days... Regards, Chris

Weekly Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to

Re: SoCal FIOS outage(?) / static IP readdressing

In a message written on Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:51:26PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote: > I'd call my business FIOS "prosumer" ;). Honestly, I'm not sure why > you'd get business FIOS over residential FIOS if you don't need static > IP addresses, at least if you're at an address where both are

Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization

Hey Chris, Size has a lot to do with policy. For very large organizations, regional models make sense. Orwell had his regional divisions[1] and Level3 has theirs[2]. TW had a domestic version of regions before things were centralized. I'd argue for the organizational affect of