Re: I'm getting these bounce messages for some bizarre reason.

It's probably subspace interference caused by high levels of neutrinos. On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Large Hadron Collider < large.hadron.colli...@gmx.com> wrote: > Would you on the fine mailing list be able to find out what's going on > here? > > > > Forwarded Message >

I'm getting these bounce messages for some bizarre reason.

Would you on the fine mailing list be able to find out what's going on here? Forwarded Message Subject:Delivery Status Notification(Failure) Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 19:01:29 GMT From: postmas...@o2email.co.uk To: large.hadron.colli...@gmx.com Your message:

Lille, France

Hi, I am looking for insight into which carriers have metropolitan or last mile networks in this city. Preferably connected to Paris. Roderick Beck Director of Global Sales United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com 85 Király utca, 1077 Budapest

Re: euNetworks, DE-CIX

Hello Michael, we (AS196922) do have 10g transit links in Munich from AS33891 and I can recommended it: http://www.core-backbone.de/, http://bgp.he.net/AS33891, pricing and quality especially for German and European networks are fine. If you can pm me your exact location, I could also

Re: euNetworks, DE-CIX

Munich. Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Alistair Mackenzie Date: 5/24/17 10:53 AM (GMT-08:00) To: Michael J McCafferty Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: euNetworks, DE-CIX Which

Re: euNetworks, DE-CIX

Which location? On 24 May 2017 at 09:49, Michael J McCafferty wrote: > Operators, > We are a US hosting company, expanding in to Europe. In the US we > use Level 3 and AIS (AS6130) and Cogent. We planned to use Level 3 and > Cogent in EU as well, but our experience

euNetworks, DE-CIX

Operators, We are a US hosting company, expanding in to Europe. In the US we use Level 3 and AIS (AS6130) and Cogent. We planned to use Level 3 and Cogent in EU as well, but our experience with Level 3 support has been less than stellar. I am looking for an Internet provider with whom

Linux container (Docker) or linux VM RFC2544/EtherSAM appliance

Group, We are looking for options or opinions on a cost effective RFC2544/EtherSAM appliance we can run on a VM and/or as a Linux container on equipment being placed at the premise. See http://www.vg-labs.com/ for an explanation of the device we would like to run these appliances on.

RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic

Sdn/nfv for the physical layer... c'mon man, don't you know we are going to have virtual-fiber too , LOL , jk of course -Aaron -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Keith Medcalf Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 5:52 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: