> Agreed with the /48 but ARIN doesn't appear to agree with our justification
> for a /36 thus far.
>
>
I am not sure how you have been communicating with ARIN, my experience with
them strongly suggest that after you put in your request, pickup the phone and
call them, speak to the analyst a
Hi,
No, that's for changes and updates related to the list. I would stick with w/
outages@ and outages-discussion@ as mentioned below.
outa...@outages.org - Warnings of (un)planned outages and reports of observed
current outages
outages-discuss...@outages.org - Discussion about post outages
(t
I also noticed an outages-announce - is that for people who don't sub to
the other two, or should one do all 3 to be fully notified?
j
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Damian Menscher via NANOG
wrote:
> There are two lists, depending on whether you're reporting an ongoing
> outage, or just ta
There are two lists, depending on whether you're reporting an ongoing
outage, or just talking about one:
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
Damian
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Nicholas Oas wrote:
> I'd be interested t
"Radu-Adrian Feurdean" writes:
> No, but I assume IPv6 is still subject to common-sense.
I don't see how you can make that assumption.
If common sense had been applied, then people would have realized that
there are more important parameters than address conservation to
consider when it comes t
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 09:41:29PM -0400,
Nicholas Oas wrote
a message of 37 lines which said:
> Have isitdownorjustme sites simply superceded the need for such
> lists?
isitdownorjustme-type sites are very limited: one vantage point, and
few (or none) indication of the methodology they use.
6 matches
Mail list logo
