It is worth noting, however, that the former AllStream ASN (formerly AT&T
Canada) AS15290 is a completely different thing, and has distinct
infrastructure and routing from the AboveNet ASN which is operated by Zayo.
Although they are probably using "Free" Zayo transport by now.
If I am grossly wro
> On Aug 8, 2017, at 5:48 PM, Keenan Tims wrote:
> While they do practice peering protectionism and only purchase transit out of
> country, the situation is not *quite* so bad that all traffic round-trips
> through the US.
No, not all, 64%. By comparison, only 0.27% of intra-US traffic goes t
Ah, okay. I haven't used one yet.
Also, I don't talk about beta outside of beta. ;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Reynolds"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: "NANOG"
Forgot reply all...
That does not apply to the infinity. Those shipped with 1.9.8dev.
On Aug 8, 2017 8:03 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote:
> 1.9.7+hotfix.1 is the currently available stable. 1.9.1.1 was released on
> May 1st.
>
> https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Updates-Blog/EdgeMAX-
> EdgeRoute
1.9.7+hotfix.1 is the currently available stable. 1.9.1.1 was released on May
1st.
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Updates-Blog/EdgeMAX-EdgeRouter-software-security-release-v1-9-7-hotfix-1/ba-p/2019161
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midw
OK, Maybe I was a bit overly dramatic. One of the big 3 peered with
us in a US location, but refused to peer in Canada.
I can't recall if we actually did specifically ask Rogers at one
point or not. I know we haven't asked recently.
At 08:41 PM 08/08/2017, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> On Aug
It seems to me the original question was asking about it more from a legal
perspective, in other words does Canadian traffic have to stay in Canada. IANAL
(or a Canadian), but the answer is "mostly, no, especially as related to
publicly routed traffic" as should be evidenced based on what's alre
On 2017-08-08 17:10, Bill Woodcock wrote:
No. In fact, Bell Canada / Bell Aliant and Telus guarantee that you_will_ go
through Chicago, Seattle, New York, or Ashburn, since none of them peer
anywhere in Canada at all.
The major national networks (Bell, Rogers, Telus, Shaw, Zayo/Allstream)
> On Aug 8, 2017, at 5:33 PM, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
>
>
>
> With the peering policies of the major Canadian ISPs, you're virtually
> guaranteed to hairpin through the US on most paths.
>
> Robellus (Rogers, Bell & Telus) will peer with you at any of their major
> Canadian peering points,
With the peering policies of the major Canadian ISPs, you're
virtually guaranteed to hairpin through the US on most paths.
Robellus (Rogers, Bell & Telus) will peer with you at any of their
major Canadian peering points, such as NYC, Chicago or LA.
At 10:01 AM 20/07/2017, Hiers, David wr
TR,
MTS Allstream is no longer a combined entity. MTS was purchased by Bell
Canada and Allstream was purchased by Zayo.
-- Stephen
On 2017-08-08 8:19 PM, TR Shaw wrote:
Bill,
What does Bell buying MTS do? Does it change your statement or will the MTS
portion of Bell still peer locally?
T
> On Aug 8, 2017, at 5:19 PM, TR Shaw wrote:
>
> Bill,
>
> What does Bell buying MTS do? Does it change your statement or will the MTS
> portion of Bell still peer locally?
I’d have to go back and look at the actual ASNs in our analysis. I think what
we called “MTS Allstream” in the chart i
I've heard of some people that don't have the capital to purchase their own
block yet, but want PI space so they can move away from whomever is providing
their transit + IP space now. I'm sure the discussed reason is much more
prevalent, though.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing So
Bill,
What does Bell buying MTS do? Does it change your statement or will the MTS
portion of Bell still peer locally?
Tom
> On Aug 8, 2017, at 8:10 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:01 AM, Hiers, David wrote:
>> For traffic routing, is anyone constraining cross-border ro
> On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:01 AM, Hiers, David wrote:
> For traffic routing, is anyone constraining cross-border routing between
> Canada and the US? IOW, if you are routing from Toronto to Montreal, do you
> have to guarantee that the path cannot go through, say, Syracuse, New York?
No. In fac
On 20/07/2017, Hiers, David wrote:
> Hi,
> We're looking to extend some services into Canada. While our lawyers dig
> into it, I thought that I'd ask the hive mind about border restrictions.
>
> For traffic routing, is anyone constraining cross-border routing between
> Canada and the US? IOW, if
To my knowledge this is the meeting network.
https://spoofer.caida.org/recent_tests.php?as_include=19230
Your interpretation of the results is congruent with mine. If you look
through the history of tests you can see SAV is usually deployed on the
network during the meeting.
This is true of oth
On Tue Jul 25, 2017 at 08:31:54PM -0700, Tim Stevenson wrote:
> Actually, only two.
>
> tstevens-92160yc-1# sh int cap | beg 1/49 | eg Eth|Speed
> Ethernet1/49
> Speed: 4
> Ethernet1/50
> Speed: 1000,1,25000,4,5,10
> Ethernet1/51
> Speed:
On Tue Jul 25, 2017 at 08:31:54PM -0700, Tim Stevenson wrote:
> tstevens-92160yc-1# sh int cap | beg 1/49 | eg Eth|Speed
> Ethernet1/49 > Speed: 4
> Ethernet1/50 > Speed: 1000,1,25000,4,5,10
> Ethernet1/51 > Speed: 4
> Et
All,
I am at a point where I need to update our servers that provision our customer
cable modems. I would like to see what other options are out there that people
like.
If anyone in the community has any recommendations it would be appreciated.
Thank you,
Dan
Disclaimer
The information con
Message off list please
Jason Wilson
Remotely Located
Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
530-651-1736
530-748-9608 Cell
www.remotelylocated.com
Hi,
We're looking to extend some services into Canada. While our lawyers dig into
it, I thought that I'd ask the hive mind about border restrictions.
For traffic routing, is anyone constraining cross-border routing between Canada
and the US? IOW, if you are routing from Toronto to Montreal, do
They're probably looking for a G.709 spec service. You still need to know
something about their traffic, is it analog RFOG, or something already framed
like SONET or 1/10/100G. If they can hand you a connection with G.709 styled
framing most modern transport gear can ship it end-to-end, ev
No a single fiber bundle cut doesn’t cause this level of outage.
I am at a family reunion in Nova Scotia and – Bell internet is down, all cell
services are down, most land lines are down and 911 services are problematic.
A lot of flights in Halifax have been cancelled (impacting our reunion).
And I’d *love* to hear the story they come up with when you ask why they only
want to rent space vs buy it…
-C
> On Jul 27, 2017, at 9:22 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> We were contacted by Admiral Hosting in London to rent some our
>> unused IP space.
>
> anyone wanting to rent/lease space is 99
It was AS12389 who leaked for few minutes.
>From my view, AS7922, 16059, 4134, 6805, 13649, 29562, 31334, 9116 were all
affected.
For example 50.18.174.0/18 from AWS AS16509, right before:
[image: Inline image 1]
Duration:
[image: Inline image 2]
After:
[image: Inline image 3]
--Wilson
On
For about two minutes from Tue Jul 25 21:09:42 2017 GMT to 21:11:30 2017,
routes to AWS were routed to stream-internet.net and got blackholed.
for example, route to 50.18.x.x at the time:
5. sd-cr01-te3-4.161.nyc.stream 0.0% 3 350.9 249.9 173.9 350.9 91.2
6. anc-cr03-xe-5-0-1.149.ff.s
Hi there,
However,
this would mean a shift from VPLS to VXLAN.
On this particular sentence - it is incorrect to compare VPLS and VXLAN.
One is a set of control plane mechanisms for discovery and tunnel setup
and data plane encapsulations and multipoint reachability model, while
the other is j
Would be pretty great if mobile worked... 😎
--
Onward!,
Jason Hellenthal,
Systems & Network Admin,
Mobile: 0x9CA0BD58,
JJH48-ARIN
On Jul 18, 2017, at 15:39, Edwin Pers wrote:
+1 for the serverscheck.com gear. Been running it as a humidity monitor in the
plant for a year or so now a
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 4:48 AM Lee Howard wrote:
>
> Depending on the capability of the exporter, you don't need to export full
flow information. With Cisco's Flexible Netflow you can define the
aggregation in the flow cache you are monitoring. You are not required to
use a 7-tuple.
An aggregati
Hi,
The CAIDA Spoofer project has been collecting and publicly sharing
data on the deployment of source address validation since March 2016.
We've built up a reasonably large install-base of the open-source
client, and receive tests from 400-500 unique IPs per day. We're
posting reports with link
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:54:01PM -0400, Michael Wayne wrote:
> We were contacted by Admiral Hosting in London to rent some our
> unused IP space. While they insist that they're not spammers, we can
> not find out much about them.
>
> Has anyone had any dealings with this company? Legit?
* Ronald F. Guilmette [2017-08-02 09:37]:
>
> The annotations in the RIPE WHOIS record for AS202746 seem pretty clear to me.
> This thing is B-O-G-U-S!
You know, people might be more willing to listen to you when you
express your points in a less emotional and aggressive tone.
Regards
Sebasti
At 07:39 PM 7/25/2017 Tuesday, Bill Woodcock opined:
> On Jul 25, 2017, at 7:25 PM, James Braunegg
wrote:
>
> Dear Nanog
>
> Just wondering if anyone is using the Cisco
Nexus 93180YC with the LAN enterprise license
and has any honest feedback about this
platform, especially if you are usin
Tried the Infinity, unsuccessfully. Several of them. Ended up pulling them
all, sitting in my homelab for now. Multiple full tables, nothing fancy for
firewall or QOS, but ran into issues with random ribd/bgpd crashes and
kernel panics. I've submitted a lot of logs and core dumps to UBNT. I would
p
Hello,
We use all three globally.
NTT – Like everyone already stated, excellent customer service. Fast and very
knowledgeable.
TELIA – It was a rocky start with them in the beginning, but they’ve been very
good lately (About a year). Customer service is always fast and decent. In the
begin
Mel -
My apologies. There is a NRPM change log is available in the navigation box
on the right hand side of the NRPM page, and it contains links to the two
policy
language changes (which I’ve included below for ready reference) -
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2016_3.html
http
John,
Forgive me if I'm missing something obvious, but I looked at all the links in
the email you forwarded to TW list, and I cannot see anything that specifically
details the set of two policy changes you mentioned. The minutes of the June
meeting talk about some policy changes in general, but
NANOGers:
Two new policies affecting transfers of number resources have been implemented
at ARIN – it is worthing taking a moment to become familiar with these changes
if
you manage IP number resources.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Begin forwarded message:
From: ARIN mailt
Hi Ramy,
Having worked with NTT & GTT, but not Telia, I can heartily recommend
NTT. Every one of these providers has its peering challenges so you'll
need diversity regardless of the one you pick, but the operations team
over at NTT has been absolutely stellar in terms of technical know-how
and al
41 matches
Mail list logo
