2nd call for presentations RIPE 75

Dear colleagues, Please note the approaching deadline of *20 August 2017* for RIPE 75 plenary programme submissions. You can find the CFP for RIPE 75 below or at https://ripe75.ripe.net/submit-topic/cfp/, for your proposals for plenary session presentations, tutorials, workshops, BoFs (Birds of a

For the Wireless Guys

https://phys.org/news/2017-08-transmission-terahertz-multiplexer.html Roderick Beck Director of Global Sales United Cable Company DRG Undersea Consulting Affiliate Member www.unitedcablecompany.com 85 Király utca, 1077 Budapest rod.b...@unitedcablecompany

Re: For the Wireless Guys

Good for a few meters at best? Terahertz is blocked by air. -Dan On Mon, 14 Aug 2017, Rod Beck wrote: https://phys.org/news/2017-08-transmission-terahertz-multiplexer.html Roderick Beck Director of Global Sales United Cable Company DRG Undersea Consulting Affiliate Member www.unitedcabl

Re: For the Wireless Guys

Turn up the Tx power a bit and you'll have a nice little heater too. Matt Freitag Network Engineer Information Technology Michigan Technological University (906) 487-3696 <%28906%29%20487-3696> https://www.mtu.edu/ https://www.mtu.edu/it On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Dan Hollis wrote: > Goo

Re: Puerto Rico Internet Exchange

On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote: > Hi Arturo, > > Good call. I believe the funds are coming from the USF? (Mike Hammet knows > more about this than me). I had conversations with multiple congressional > staffers about using USF funds for IXP development. They're in for good

Re: For the Wireless Guys

I had my suspicions. 😊 From: Curtis Maurand Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 9:44 PM To: Dan Hollis Cc: Rod Beck; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: For the Wireless Guys The higher the frequency, the more it acts like light. at that frequency, it wouldn't take much to

AS29073, 196.16.0.0/14, Level3: Why does anyone peer with these schmucks?

Sorry for the re-post, but it has been brought to my attention that my inclusion, in my prior posting, of various unsavory FQDNs resolving to various IPv4 addresses on AS29073 has triggered some people's spam filters. (Can't imagine why. :-) So I am re-posting this message now, with just a link

RE: AS29073, 196.16.0.0/14, Level3: Why does anyone peer with these schmucks?

If you believe that a customer of a network service provider is in violation of that service providers AUP, you should email ab...@serviceprovider.net. Most large networks have a security team that monitors that email address regularly and will cooperate with you to address the problem. Dave

Re: AS29073, 196.16.0.0/14, Level3: Why does anyone peer with these schmucks?

Den 14. aug. 2017 21.51 skrev "Ronald F. Guilmette" : Sorry for the re-post, but it has been brought to my attention that my inclusion, in my prior posting, of various unsavory FQDNs resolving to various IPv4 addresses on AS29073 has triggered some people's spam filters. (Can't imagine why. :-)

Anyone from AS62052 ASNICOM here?

Sorry for posting to the list, but we are unable to find any working contact information. If anyone from AS 62052 (ASNICOM) is on the list, please contact me. You're advertising some of our IP space and we need to get that corrected. Thanks, John

Re: AS29073, 196.16.0.0/14, Level3: Why does anyone peer with these schmucks?

1. They aren’t the internet police either or so quite a few of them think 2. Hanlon’s razor --srs > On 15-Aug-2017, at 2:17 AM, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > > Why are domain registrars allowing some of those domains, which are clearly > advertising highly illegal content that will get you in jail