On 12/16/17, Mike Hammett wrote:
> That project was paid for by ARRA funds and ran out.
>
> The FCC picked up the ball by expanding the scope of its 477 program. That
> data is available directly on their site or via some sites like
> broadbandnow.com
I didn't know about that - thanks. But it ju
Try looking to see what independents might be around the area you're looking
at. See if any of them are willing to expand. Many of us are chomping at the
bit to expand (with competitive products), but are having a hard time nailing
people down.
Independents are more likely to have good custome
Will anyone comment on the practice of large enterprises using non RFC1918 IP
space that other entities are assigned by ARIN for internal routing?
Just curious as to how wide spread this might be. I just heard of this
happening with a large ISP and never really thought about it until now.
Rober
Had a previous employee or I discovered it on the network segment after we had
some weird routing issues and had to get that cleaned up. I don't know why
anyone would do that when there is tons of private IP space.
> On Dec 17, 2017, at 17:30, Robert Webb wrote:
>
> Will anyone comment on the
On 12/17/2017 04:30 PM, Robert Webb wrote:
Will anyone comment on the practice of large enterprises using non RFC1918 IP
space that other entities are assigned by ARIN for internal routing?
Just curious as to how wide spread this might be. I just heard of this
happening with a large ISP and
On 12/17/17 14:30, Robert Webb wrote:
> Will anyone comment on the practice of large enterprises using non RFC1918 IP
> space that other entities are assigned by ARIN for internal routing?
>
> Just curious as to how wide spread this might be. I just heard of this
> happening with a large ISP and
I worked alongside a company that used addresses assigned to the Syrian
govt for their "guest" network. They were a pretty large org, presumably
this was done to reduce risk - firewall rules, accidentally leaking guest
prefixes to their internal nets, or just straight-up simplicity. They were
in a
> On Dec 17, 2017, at 14:33, Matt Hoppes
> wrote:
>
> Had a previous employee or I discovered it on the network segment after we
> had some weird routing issues and had to get that cleaned up. I don't know
> why anyone would do that when there is tons of private IP space.
Unless there isn't.
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 5:31 PM Robert Webb wrote:
> Will anyone comment on the practice of large enterprises using non RFC1918
> IP space that other entities are assigned by ARIN for internal routing?
>
> Just curious as to how wide spread this might be. I just heard of this
> happening with a l
On 17 December 2017 at 17:57, James Downs wrote:
> Unless there isn't.. I've worked at more than one company that had used up
> all the private space. Then you have the cases where some M&A causes
> overlapping IP space.
>
Or places like Ontario, where the government runs a registry service for
Matt Hoppes writes:
> Had a previous employee or I discovered it on the network segment after
> we had some weird routing issues and had to get that cleaned up. I don't
> know why anyone would do that when there is tons of private IP space.
Excuse 1: "We'll never connect to the internet!"
Excus
I had a vendor at $dayjob prior to my arrival who assigned all their
customers ip space based on the customer number. when i got there all the
internal network was assigned space from an company in the middle east.
$dayjob didn't have the in-house knowledge to know what was going on and as
they ne
Robert,
I’ve heard of two cases recently, large companies (non carrier/ISP). One
company looking to solve challenge with IPv6 and 6to4 and DNS.
Also curious how wide-spread this is? Maybe just the kick in the butt for
catching the elusive IPv6 unicorn?
~Richard
> On Dec 17, 2017, at 3:30 PM, R
Hi,
I know of some enterprise IT equipment that does this. It was reserved space
at the time it was picked.
It does not leak from the box, but every once in a while one of these IPs show
up in a customer visible log, and causes confusion.
In ways it is better then rfc 1918 space as it has les
Apologies for not responding sooner.
This came to light with me on a forum where someone posted that they thought it
strange that their MTA received an IP that is assigned to the DoD DNIC.
Where I work I have the opposite issue. They have a lot of public IPv4 space
and only use it internally n
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 18:24:40 -0700
Richard Porter wrote:
> Robert,
> Ive heard of two cases recently, large companies (non carrier/ISP). One
> company looking to solve challenge with IPv6 and 6to4 and DNS.
>
> Also curious how wide-spread this is? Maybe just the kick in the butt for
> catchin
> On 18 Dec 2017, at 1:20 pm, Robert Webb wrote:
>
> Apologies for not responding sooner.
>
> This came to light with me on a forum where someone posted that they thought
> it strange that their MTA received an IP that is assigned to the DoD DNIC.
>
> Where I work I have the opposite issue.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2017 9:35 PM
> To: Robert Webb
> Cc: Richard Porter ; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal
> routing
>
>
> > On 18 Dec 2017, at 1:20 pm, Ro
Missent.
Welcome to IPv6, where you have technically-reserved-for-future-use
space that should never actually need to be used. Quite likely, you can
use something like 440::/16 as your private space, but please don't do
that unless you've exhausted the true private space.
You're welcome.
O
some fun examples of the size of ipv6:
https://samsclass.info/ipv6/exhaustion-2016.htm
https://www.reddit.com/r/theydidthemath/comments/2qxgxw/self_just_how_big_is_ipv6/
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Large Hadron Collider <
large.hadron.colli...@gmx.com> wrote:
> Missent.
>
> Welcome to IPv6
20 matches
Mail list logo
