On 2017-12-01 01:15, John Souvestre wrote:
> The #(provider name)sucks tweets on twitter in South Florida and South
> Texas have essentially stopped. I assume this means that providers
> have repaired almost all Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Irma damage.
In an area touched by freezing rain,
On 2017-11-30 22:34, Sean Donelan wrote:
> The #(provider name)sucks tweets on twitter in South Florida and South
> Texas have essentially stopped. I assume this means that providers
> have repaired almost all Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Irma damage.
Sorry for delay in this old topic.
In e
I'd be interested in applications around ownership of IP space or ASNs, but
there's so many ways to skin that cat already that people don't do because
it's 'hard' or 'reduces our flexibility' or sometimes because it involves
hardware upgrades as Christopher Morrow pointed out with RPKI and BGPsec.
On 23/01/18 02:12, Michael Crapse wrote:
Tier 1 just means they don't pay for ip transit themselves, only Peering.
Doesn't mean that it's good transit.
Best provider i've ever used is hurricane electric, actually a tier 2
provider, but bigger/better than many tier 1s.
I'd still categorise Hurr
Tier 1 just means they don't pay for ip transit themselves, only Peering.
Doesn't mean that it's good transit.
Best provider i've ever used is hurricane electric, actually a tier 2
provider, but bigger/better than many tier 1s.
On 22 January 2018 at 19:07, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
> On 22/01
On 22/01/18 20:05, Mike Hammett wrote:
I much prefer using WDM transport as opposed to Ethernet\VPLS transport due to
it being significantly harder (I try not to say impossible) to oversubscribe.
That said, it isn't always available at a decent rate at a given location.
Cogent has a reputation
From: Michael Crapse
Date: Monday, January 22, 2018 at 5:27 PM
To: Mark Andrews
Cc: Lee Howard , NANOG list
Subject: Re: Leasing /22
> Customers on ps4s and xboxes will hate you. They will always get "strict" nat,
> and it's your fault not mega corporation X's fault for not releasing IPv
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 03:27:49PM -0700, Michael Crapse wrote:
> Customers on ps4s and xboxes will hate you. They will always get "strict"
> nat, and it's your fault not mega corporation X's fault for not releasing
> IPv4s
I think you misspelled "those console platforms' fault for being
bad netwo
Customers on ps4s and xboxes will hate you. They will always get "strict"
nat, and it's your fault not mega corporation X's fault for not releasing
IPv4s
On 22 January 2018 at 15:23, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Add to that CGN from RFC 6598 addresses (100.64/10) + IPv6 though that
> reaches its limit
Add to that CGN from RFC 6598 addresses (100.64/10) + IPv6 though that
reaches its limit at ~4M customers.
Native IPv4 with a GUA to customers is essentially unavailable for new
ISPs. It’s a matter of picking which flavour of NAT you and your
customers are going to use. The sooner ALL ISP’s pro
IPv6 still solves your problem if you add any of NAT64, DS-Lite, 464xlat,
MAP-T, MAP-E.
Yes, you’re NATing, but only the traffic to places like Hulu, and it will
decrease over time. And while you need addresses for the outside of the
translator, you don’t need as many (or to get more as frequentl
I much prefer using WDM transport as opposed to Ethernet\VPLS transport due to
it being significantly harder (I try not to say impossible) to oversubscribe.
That said, it isn't always available at a decent rate at a given location.
Cogent has a reputation (right or wrong) for running things a l
12 matches
Mail list logo
