Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing?

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > So the recommendation to get that /24 is to cheat or otherwise mislead in > your justification? I gave up on the credibility of ARIN's justified need policy when the organization decided it was OK to transfer ARIN

Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing?

So the recommendation to get that /24 is to cheat or otherwise mislead in your justification? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "William Herrin" To:

Re: IPv4 smaller than /24 leasing?

Arguing against less than /24s in the public routing table. That's not the point being made. The point being made is the relaxation of requirements to obtain /24s for ISPs. To that I point to a statement John Curran made in a keynote I attended several conferences ago. If you wish to change

Re: any contact at mycheckfree.com

As is often the case, the Lynx text-only browser will connect successfully when other browsers won't, and did enable me to navigate to the 'contact us' page. "For inquiries, please contact us at 800-564-9184. Support hours are from 8:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M., ET, Monday through Friday, and from

Re: any contact at mycheckfree.com

Once upon a time, Randy Bush said: > i am using both ffox 59.01 and chrome 65.0.3325.162 on latest macos high > sierra. i am trying to connect to mycheckfree.com https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=mycheckfree.com -- Chris Adams

any contact at mycheckfree.com

i am using both ffox 59.01 and chrome 65.0.3325.162 on latest macos high sierra. i am trying to connect to mycheckfree.com ffox and chrome are offering sha1 and then puking when the site selects it. clearly ffox and chrome should not do this. but also, mycheckfree should not be selecting sha1.