2002::/16 is still valid - not a bogon as long as there is an IPv4 Internet.
Add the IPv4 bogons, though (2002:7f00:::/48 through 2002:7f.ff:ff.ff::/48,
& others)
On July 9, 2018 3:06:00 PM PDT, "Fabien VINCENT (NaNOG)"
wrote:
>Le 2018-07-09 18:10, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu a écrit :
>
>>
> Adjustments have been made and we are no longer accepting these.
Indeed - I no longer see these routes from you. Thanks :)
Le 2018-07-09 18:10, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu a écrit :
On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 15:21:31 +0200, "Fabien VINCENT (NaNOG)" said:
I think it's still used a bit ? I see today announcements over the
following OriginAS over more than 2000 peers.
as1103SURFnet bv
as1835Forskningsnettet - Danish
NANOG Community,
The NANOG Program Committee is excited to announce that we are now
accepting proposals for all sessions at NANOG 74 in Vancouver, BC,
Canada, October 1-3, 2018. Below is a summary of key details and
dates from the Call For Presentations on the NANOG website, which can
be found
We saw these announcements from GigaPix and ESPANIX route servers.
Adjustments have been made and we are no longer accepting these.
--
Rob Mosher
Senior Network and Software Engineer
Hurricane Electric / AS6939
On 7/9/2018 11:43 AM, Phil Lavin wrote:
The only routes i can see now for
NANOG Community,
The NANOG Program Committee is excited to announce that we are now
accepting proposals for all sessions at NANOG 74 in Vancouver, BC,
Canada, October 1-3, 2018. Below is a summary of key details and
dates from the Call For Presentations on the NANOG website, which can
be found
You can certainly add 'security' to the list.
I don't mean 'network security' here but 'information security' as a whole.
A lot of vendors (notably AV) uses of a lot of marketing terms and they
also play with the fears of people to sell their (insert revolutionary)
products/solutions.
Some of
On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 15:21:31 +0200, "Fabien VINCENT (NaNOG)" said:
> I think it's still used a bit ? I see today announcements over the
> following OriginAS over more than 2000 peers.
>
> as1103SURFnet bv
> as1835Forskningsnettet - Danish network for Research and Education
> as2847
> The only routes i can see now for 3266/197426 is two /24 v4 and one /29 v6
> that jumps on over to portugal through 1299
> (telia) -> 174 (cogent) -> 29003 (refertelecom / iptelecom).
6939 (HE) are still advertising the routes to their customers. That suggests
that 197426 is still active on
On 2018-07-06 21:18, Tom Paseka via NANOG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been casually observing the connectivity to Bitcanal / AS3266 /
> AS197426 since the thread started.
>
> After GTT shared that bitcanal had been disconnected, bitcanal was only
> visible behind Cogent. But the Cogent path now also
In response to feedback from operational security communities,
CAIDA's source address validation measurement project
(https://spoofer.caida.org) is automatically generating monthly
reports of ASes originating prefixes in BGP for systems from which
we received packets with a spoofed source address.
I am having some issues getting some traffic to Amazon and I was curious if
there were any Amazon network engineers that might be able to chat with me
for a few minutes to discuss my troubles. Shoot me an email and we will set
something up.
Thanks in advance!
Mark Spring
Information Systems
Le 2018-07-06 16:43, Gary McArtor a écrit :
Hi Youssef,
My original reply wasn't sent to the Nanog list.
Team Cymru considers 2002::/16 and 192.88.99.0/24 to be legitimate
prefixes at this time, and will be not be adding them to our bogon
filters. Our interpretation of the 6to4 anycast rfc
13 matches
Mail list logo
