On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 9:44 PM Hank Nussbacher
wrote:
> On 17/09/2018 23:26, Phil Lavin wrote:
> >> $350/mo seems to be standard. Our DCs are at $250.Seems more like
> they held onto out of date pricing for a long time then realized it.
> > For what it's worth, Telehouse London is around 30
On 17/09/2018 23:26, Phil Lavin wrote:
>> $350/mo seems to be standard. Our DCs are at $250.Seems more like they
>> held onto out of date pricing for a long time then realized it.
> For what it's worth, Telehouse London is around 30 USD/month for an x-connect
> within the same building. Our
One Wilshire is at $750/mo for XCs. Expect other constrained buildings to head
there if not already (PAIX? Can you even get one?)
-Ben.
> On Sep 17, 2018, at 2:29 PM, Daniel Corbe wrote:
>
> at 4:26 PM, Phil Lavin wrote:
>
>>> $350/mo seems to be standard. Our DCs are at $250.Seems
Doug,
> Montgomery, Douglas wrote :
> The new monitor has significant additions in the areas of diagnostics, and
> highlights issues of
> interest such as path / customer cone analysis of prefixes that cover invalid
> originations.
Thanks for all the work. More visibility will help. I have
Nusenu,
I also found your analysis very interesting and useful. Thanks for that.
>What do you think about adding graphs that show the amount of actually
>unreachable prefixes and IP space? (prefix where no alternative valid/unknown
>announcement exists)
I am also part of the NIST BGP team.
On Sep 17, 2018, at 17:51, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Patrick W. Gilmore wrote on 17/09/2018 22:40:
>> Expecting any for-profit business (all of them, not just REITs) to do
>> less than extract maximum cash is deluding yourself.
> oh sure, but price gouging is often bad business practice in the long
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote on 17/09/2018 22:40:
Expecting any for-profit business (all of them, not just REITs) to do
less than extract maximum cash is deluding yourself.
oh sure, but price gouging is often bad business practice in the long
term. Humans evolved a strong sense of injustice and
at 4:26 PM, Phil Lavin wrote:
$350/mo seems to be standard. Our DCs are at $250.Seems more like
they held onto out of date pricing for a long time then realized it.
For what it's worth, Telehouse London is around 30 USD/month for an
x-connect within the same building. Our US
My current facility (in the Ashburn, VA, USA area) is $25/mo with two for
free, but when I was shopping around, most other facilities were at least
$300/mo. Certainly not unusual but I agree it's excessive.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Phil Lavin
wrote:
> > $350/mo seems to be standard. Our
Correct. Behold the ‘active riser’. We started doing this years ago in our R
network after we were being nickeled and dimes to cross floors between our own
cages we leased from the same colo.
> On Sep 17, 2018, at 15:23, Ben Cannon wrote:
>
> fs.com has got this ready to go. Less than
> Patrick W. Gilmore wrote :
> Maybe I am confused, but I thought every for-profit business exists to
> extract as much money as possible.
Especially is said business is potentially in my 401(k) portfolio. I expect
them to milk every penny they possibly can out of their customers so my 401(k)
> $350/mo seems to be standard. Our DCs are at $250.Seems more like they
> held onto out of date pricing for a long time then realized it.
For what it's worth, Telehouse London is around 30 USD/month for an x-connect
within the same building. Our US datacentre (not Telehouse) on the other
fs.com has got this ready to go. Less than that.
> On Sep 17, 2018, at 12:54 PM, Joe Maimon wrote:
>
>
>
> Ethan O'Toole wrote:
>>> If it’s in an interduct by itself, how much would the square footage per
>>> month occupied by the average cross connect be worth?
>>
>> These big datacenter
Job,
Thanks for the input, we have a new version of our RPKI monitor that we are in
the process of moving from development systems to publicly accessible servers.
The new monitor has significant additions in the areas of diagnostics, and
highlights issues of interest such as path / customer
Ethan O'Toole wrote:
If it’s in an interduct by itself, how much would the square footage per
month occupied by the average cross connect be worth?
These big datacenter companies are REITs. Similar to self-storage
units and apartment buildings, they exist to extract as much money as
On Sep 17, 2018, at 15:08, Ethan O'Toole wrote:
>
>> If it’s in an interduct by itself, how much would the square footage per
>> month occupied by the average cross connect be worth?
>
> These big datacenter companies are REITs. Similar to self-storage units and
> apartment buildings, they
$350/mo seems to be standard. Our DCs are at $250.Seems more like they held
onto out of date pricing for a long time then realized it.
-Ben
On Sep 17, 2018, at 12:08 PM, Ethan O'Toole wrote:
>> If it’s in an interduct by itself, how much would the square footage per
>> month occupied by
If it’s in an interduct by itself, how much would the square footage per
month occupied by the average cross connect be worth?
These big datacenter companies are REITs. Similar to self-storage units
and apartment buildings, they exist to extract as much money as possible
from the users.
> On Sep 17, 2018, at 8:48 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Sep 17, 2018, at 6:54 AM, Tom Ammon wrote:
>>
>> I'm looking to understand the impact of CG-NAT on a set of netflix OCAs, in
>> an ISP environment. I see in Netflix's FAQ on the subject that traffic
>> sourced from RFC
If it’s in an interduct by itself, how much would the square footage per
month occupied by the average cross connect be worth?
I’m not saying I think $300 MRC is legitimate by any means, but, if
you’re going to talk about the ongoing costs, the space in the cable
ladder and/or fiber tray(s) also
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 at 18:38, nusenu wrote:
> Dear NIST RPKI Monitor Team,
>
> thanks for creating and maintaining the RPKI Monitor
> https://rpki-monitor.antd.nist.gov/#rpki_adopters
> I've seen your graphs in multiple routing security presentations :)
>
> What do you think about adding graphs
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Daniel Corbe wrote:
> $300 MRC for a once-off cross connect isn’t unreasonable. There’s costs
> and labor involved in running that cable through a riser. Especially if you
> want it in innerduct.
Hi Daniel,
A $300 Non-Recurring Cost, sure. The MONTHLY
> On Sep 17, 2018, at 6:54 AM, Tom Ammon wrote:
>
> I'm looking to understand the impact of CG-NAT on a set of netflix OCAs, in
> an ISP environment. I see in Netflix's FAQ on the subject that traffic
> sourced from RFC 1918/6598 endpoints can't be delivered to the OCA. Is this
> simply a
I had success cleaning up old IRR stuff via email to the contact listed in
the AS3561 whois entry. It's a different person listed now, but perhaps they
are also interested & responsive.
Jay Ford, Network Engineering
I'm looking to understand the impact of CG-NAT on a set of netflix OCAs, in
an ISP environment. I see in Netflix's FAQ on the subject that traffic
sourced from RFC 1918/6598 endpoints can't be delivered to the OCA. Is this
simply a matter of deploying the OCA on the outside of the CGN layer? What
>
> We run Iris - home-grown (South Africa), great support, small/nimble
> team that are able to fix issue, add features and give advice.
>
> Very flexible, captures plenty of data out-the-box, supports a ton of
> vendors and data points, e.t.c.
>
> It's a commercial solution, but not out of
Dear NIST RPKI Monitor Team,
thanks for creating and maintaining the RPKI Monitor
https://rpki-monitor.antd.nist.gov/#rpki_adopters
I've seen your graphs in multiple routing security presentations :)
What do you think about adding graphs that show the amount of actually
unreachable prefixes and
Job wrote (2018-07-16) [1]:
> Perhaps the RIRs should start an outreach program to proactively inform
> the owners of those 2,200 invalid route announcements to get them to
> either fix or delete the RPKI ROA.
Since I'm also interested [2] in reducing the amount of RPKI INVALIDs in an
efficient
at 10:57 AM, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Is anyone else affected by a massive price increase for x-conns by
Telehouse Chelsea?
When we moved in a few years ago they were asking 150$, it changed to
200$ and now we are asked to pay 260$. That's 73% more. I don't think
inflation is that high in the
On 9/17/18 7:57 AM, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Is anyone else affected by a massive price increase for x-conns by
Telehouse Chelsea?
When we moved in a few years ago they were asking 150$, it changed to
200$ and now we are asked to pay 260$. That's 73% more. I don't think
inflation is that high in
Still better than what other places charge (*cough* DR. *cough*)
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
> Is anyone else affected by a massive price increase for x-conns by
> Telehouse Chelsea?
>
> When we moved in a few years ago they were asking 150$, it changed to
>
Is anyone else affected by a massive price increase for x-conns by
Telehouse Chelsea?
When we moved in a few years ago they were asking 150$, it changed to
200$ and now we are asked to pay 260$. That's 73% more. I don't think
inflation is that high in the United states.
I get the impression that
If you find someone helpful at L3/CL for your request, I would like to have its
contact (off-list). I've been trying to cleanup old objects too without much
success.
Eric
On Sep 17 2018, at 10:15 am, Brian Rak wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get some old IRR objects removed from the LEVEL3 database,
On 17/09/18 15:15, Brian Rak wrote:
> I used to use routing@level3 to get this done, however they don't seem
> to reply anymore.
>
> http://www.irr.net/docs/list.html directs me to r...@level3.net, which has
> an autoreply that says "open a ticket"
You may wish to start by swapping the Level3
I'm trying to get some old IRR objects removed from the LEVEL3 database,
and not having much luck.
Their support guys silently closed my ticket and then had our account
manager email us directly basically saying "we don't what you want us to
do".
I used to use routing@level3 to get this
35 matches
Mail list logo
