On 13/Feb/19 20:00, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> Main advantage of out-of-path is that you decouple FIB and RIB scaling
> requirements and feature requirements. Your backbone device does not
> need to be qualified for large RIB or BGP at all. And when you do need
> more RIB scaling, you can upgrade
On 14/Feb/19 04:41, Colton Conor wrote:
> Just wondering, but what IP-capable MPLS switches are people using to
> deploy AE to residential internet connections? Most 48 port AE
> switches from repetuable vendors are crazy expensive, and I can't see
> how the ROI would ever work compared to
Just wondering, but what IP-capable MPLS switches are people using to
deploy AE to residential internet connections? Most 48 port AE switches
from repetuable vendors are crazy expensive, and I can't see how the ROI
would ever work compared to GPON.
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 4:25 PM Mark Tinka
I am already and very happy customer
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 17:08 Anthony Leto wrote:
> I would recommend NetActuate as well. They really know their stuff! They
> helped a company I used to work at immensely with LVS and DNS load
> balancing in an anycast configuration. I would use them
I would recommend NetActuate as well. They really know their stuff! They helped
a company I used to work at immensely with LVS and DNS load balancing in an
anycast configuration. I would use them anytime.
Anthony Leto
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> I highly recommend
>> Was there meant to be a screenshot or some explanation of what would
>> be denied here?
>
> sorry
seems mailing list filters; so it was not my fault.
try https://archive.psg.com/skype.jpg
randy
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:06:17 -0800,
Hunter Fuller wrote:
> Was there meant to be a screenshot or some explanation of what would
> be denied here?
sorry
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:12 PM Randy Bush wrote:
>
> an update to skype will pop up and ask you
>
>
> deny. you will have to deny repeatedly. there is no reason in the
> world skype should have access to your icloud, contacts, ...
Was there meant to be a screenshot or some explanation of what
> Why not use jitsi meet?
i am familiar with jitsi. it's fine. but i am trying to get research
done, not teach/preach conferencing to a bunch of researchers.
this was just a warning about an attack through a skype update; not
meant as a discussion of conferencing technologies or an opportunity
On 14/2/19 9:03 am, Randy Bush wrote:
yep. some researchers are still stuck there for con calls. i hate
it.
Why not use jitsi meet?
Free, Open Source, Standards compliant, WebRTC, an instance is hosted by
IETF as well...
It's actually perfect for researchers.
> Perhaps (issue created on 6 Dec 2017) relevant:
>
> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/skype/forum/skype_accountms-skype_privacyms/skype-suggests-people-from-my-contact-list-to/d8cc03ad-fa15-4de7-8d96-51510615cff4
perms for contact list is one thing. perms for icloud account is
another.
Perhaps (issue created on 6 Dec 2017) relevant:
https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/skype/forum/skype_accountms-skype_privacyms/skype-suggests-people-from-my-contact-list-to/d8cc03ad-fa15-4de7-8d96-51510615cff4
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 12:11 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> an update to skype will pop
>> yep. some researchers are still stuck there for con calls. i hate
>> it.
> welp, at least the nsa can keep trac in real-time.
the nsa is not in the researchers' threat model. this is not that kind
of math.
randy
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:20 PM Randy Bush wrote:
> > Y U USE SKYPE?
>
> yep. some researchers are still stuck there for con calls. i hate it.
>
>
welp, at least the nsa can keep trac in real-time.
they have that going for them.
> Y U USE SKYPE?
yep. some researchers are still stuck there for con calls. i hate it.
randy
Y U USE SKYPE?
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:11 PM Randy Bush wrote:
> an update to skype will pop up and ask you
>
>
> deny. you will have to deny repeatedly. there is no reason in the
> world skype should have access to your icloud, contacts, ...
>
> randy
an update to skype will pop up and ask you
deny. you will have to deny repeatedly. there is no reason in the
world skype should have access to your icloud, contacts, ...
randy
Yes thank you Saku! We’ve accounted for the fiber distance. We just want to
be able to quote the hardware latency. Thanks for verifying that Juniper; just
need the Tellabs... thank you:)
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 12:53 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> Hey Steve,
>
> 15us would
Hey,
in-band, out-of-band is bit of misnomers to me. You mean in-path or out-of-path.
Main advantage of out-of-path is that you decouple FIB and RIB scaling
requirements and feature requirements. Your backbone device does not
need to be qualified for large RIB or BGP at all. And when you do
Hey Steve,
15us would be more than you'll realistically see in uncongested MX960,
but it is in the ball-bark. I've not tried Tellabs, if customer is
latency sensitive you probably want to look constant time pipeline
devices rather than run to completion npus. You'll see low single
digit us on
> On 11 Feb 2019, at 18:18, Jordan Michaels wrote:
>
> Virtkick was acquired by OnApp
> (https://www.virtkick.com/blog/onapp-to-acquire-virtkick.html), so you might
> be able to contact OnApp about it.
"Ultimately, the acquisition was not consummated, and Virtkick remained an
independent
I highly recommend NetActuate.
Awesome folks, great network and customer interface and willing to do custom
stuff when needed.
Very flexible and easy to work with.
Owen
> On Feb 11, 2019, at 10:18 , Jordan Michaels wrote:
>
> Virtkick was acquired by OnApp
>
Virtkick was acquired by OnApp
(https://www.virtkick.com/blog/onapp-to-acquire-virtkick.html), so you might be
able to contact OnApp about it.
Hope this helps.
--
Kind regards,
Jordan Michaels
Vivio Technologies
- Original Message -
From: "Mehmet Akcin"
To: "nanog"
Sent: Friday, 8
All,
I am chairing the IEEE 802.3 New Ethernet Applications ad hoc, which has an
activity underway that is looking at doing an update to its 2012 Ethernet
Bandwidth Assessment (see
http://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/bwa/BWA_Report.pdf).
Please note that this effort will focus on gathering information
For my fellow americans, LLUB stands for Local Loop UnBundling. What we
might call a Unbundled Network Element.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 5:49 AM Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> >> In any case, we are now building out our own fiber to cover the gaps
> >>
Dears
Am trying to find some documents and practical implementations regarding
bgp topological vs centralized route reflector(In-band vs out-of-band)
Any good shares are appreciated
I find the input to this discussion from non-US operators very useful.
Thank you. One flaw of America is our parochialism and isolation means we
don't learn from experiences elsewhere. We are so used to leading the world
in technology that we have very little exposure to advances outside of the
-- Forwarded message -
From: william manning
Date: Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 9:34 PM
Subject: wither cyclops?
To:
Did this tool die on the vine?
https://cyclops.cs.ucla.edu/
/Wm
Looking for two latency profiles, best/worst cast would be great for the
Telllabs 8860 and Juniper MX960. Looks like the Juniper may be in the 15us
range
Both cases would be a 10Gb -1Gb and 1Gb - 10Gb
We’d understand the serialization piece; really looking to provide a customer
the
In response to feedback from operational security communities,
CAIDA's source address validation measurement project
(https://spoofer.caida.org) is automatically generating monthly
reports of ASes originating prefixes in BGP for systems from which
we received packets with a spoofed source address.
>
> 1/ For instance AT does not accept BGP UPDATES with 2914 anywhere in the
> AS_PATH except on the direct EBGP sessions between 7018 and 2914. This means
> that you can craft BGP UPDATES with 2914 all you want, but 7018 won't accept
> them. You can't inject yourself between AT and NTT
31 matches
Mail list logo
