Hi,
On 20/03/2019 00:03, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> Ok, so, just trying to flesh out the idea to something that can be
> usefully implemented…
>
> 1) People send an eBGP multi-hop feed of well-known-community routes
> to a collector, or send them over normal peering sessions to
> something that aggre
On 3/19/19, 8:23 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Ronald F. Guilmette"
wrote:
In message
,
Tom Beecher wrote:
>Calling everyone an idiot in the midst of Endless Pontification isn't
>really a recipe for success.
I did not call "everyone" an idiot. I'm quite completel
In message
,
Tom Beecher wrote:
>Calling everyone an idiot in the midst of Endless Pontification isn't
>really a recipe for success.
I did not call "everyone" an idiot. I'm quite completely sure that there
are innumerable people in all of the referenced companies who are consumate
and hardw
[[ I've just collected some new information about the length of time
that this specific bincoin extortion spamming bad actor has been
on Digital Ocean's network. For those who may only have an interest
in that one detail, you can just skip down to the line of plus signs
and start rea
> On Mar 19, 2019, at 1:55 PM, Frank Habicht wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 19/03/2019 23:13, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> Generally, static lists like that are difficult to maintain when
>> they’re tracking multiple routes from multiple parties.
>
> agreed.
> and on the other extreme, communities are very
Hi,
On 19/03/2019 23:13, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> Generally, static lists like that are difficult to maintain when
> they’re tracking multiple routes from multiple parties.
agreed.
and on the other extreme, communities are very much prone to abuse.
I guess I could set any community on a number of p
> On Mar 19, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
>
> On 2019-03-19 21:04, Hansen, Christoffer wrote:
>> https://github.com/netravnen/well-known-anycast-prefixes/blob/master/list.txt
>> PR's and/or suggestions appreciated! (Can be turned into $lirDB friendly
>> format->style RPSL)
>
> Mo
> On Mar 19, 2019, at 1:04 PM, Hansen, Christoffer
> wrote:
>
> something like this?
>
> https://github.com/netravnen/well-known-anycast-prefixes/blob/master/list.txt
>
> PR's and/or suggestions appreciated! (Can be turned into $lirDB friendly
> format->style RPSL)
Generally, static lists l
On 2019-03-19 21:04, Hansen, Christoffer wrote:
https://github.com/netravnen/well-known-anycast-prefixes/blob/master/list.txt
PR's and/or suggestions appreciated! (Can be turned into $lirDB friendly
format->style RPSL)
Most DNS root servers are anycasted.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
something like this?
https://github.com/netravnen/well-known-anycast-prefixes/blob/master/list.txt
PR's and/or suggestions appreciated! (Can be turned into $lirDB friendly
format->style RPSL)
On 19/03/2019 18:12, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
> I wonder whether anyone has ever compiled a list of well-kn
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:52:19AM -0700, Damian Menscher via NANOG wrote:
> Careful thought should be given into whether the BGP community means "this
> is an anycast prefix" vs "please hot-potato to this prefix".
> Latency-sensitive applications may prefer hot-potato to their network even
> if it
Careful thought should be given into whether the BGP community means "this
is an anycast prefix" vs "please hot-potato to this prefix".
Latency-sensitive applications may prefer hot-potato to their network even
if it's not technically an anycast range, as their private backbone may be
faster (less
A Well-known BGP community will be better.
You'll need to rewrite next hop or do something similar if AnyCast prefixes
are learnt from a multi hop BGP feed, and it made the configuration more
complicated and difficult to debug.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019, 01:48 Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
> Am 19.03.19 um
Am 19.03.19 um 18:39 schrieb Bill Woodcock:
>> On Mar 19, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Fredy Kuenzler
>> wrote: I wonder whether anyone has ever compiled a list of
>> well-known Anycast prefixes.
>
> I don’t know of one.
>
> It seems like a good idea.
>
> BGP-multi-hop might be a reasonable way to coll
Hi Fredy,
Our anycast prefixes for DNS resolver
185.222.222.0/24
2a09::/48
You can add them if someone will maintain a list.
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Fredy Kuenzler
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 1:13 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: well-known Anyca
> On Mar 19, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
>
> I wonder whether anyone has ever compiled a list of well-known Anycast
> prefixes.
I don’t know of one.
It seems like a good idea.
BGP-multi-hop might be a reasonable way to collect them.
If others agree that it’s a good idea, and it
I wonder whether anyone has ever compiled a list of well-known Anycast
prefixes.
Such as
1.1.1.0/24
8.8.8.0/24
9.9.9.0/24
...
Might be useful for a routing policy such as "always route hot-potato".
PS. this mail is not intended to start a flame war of hot vs. cold
potato routing.
--
Fredy Kue
Apologies, it was in reply to a list mail. Just bad threading.
* niels=na...@bakker.net (niels=na...@bakker.net) [Tue 19 Mar 2019, 16:51 CET]:
Kind of bad netiquette to repost a private email to the list
Absolutely unrelated to Ronald's original post, but it's ironic that the
abuse@ address is itself heavily "abused", by commercial copyright
enforcement companies which think it's a catch-all address for things which
are not operationally related to the health of a network (BGP hijacks,
DDoS, spam e
I agree it could have definitely been simplified, but I also found the “endless
pontification” a little amusing this morning. What I do not find amusing is
the social outrage and identity politics that has made it’s way into the sacred
NANOG mailing list.
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Tom Beecher
Kind of bad netiquette to repost a private email to the list
-- Niels.
Just to clarify, we are RFC 2142 section 4 compliant. I mention section 4
specifically as that is directly within my realm of control, the remaining
sections I will check.
Both methods, web form submission and abuse@ are integrated ultimately into the
same workflow. Being transparent, as things
I originally held back on a similar response. But I had the exact same opinion.
It works against your argument when you start off with insults and
condescension. Personally, I would not refer anyone to someone making a post
like this.
Regards,
Ray Orsini – CEO
Orsini IT, LLC – Technology Cons
On 3/19/19 10:49 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 09:23:34AM -0400, Jeff McAdams wrote:
We would prefer, but don't require, that you use the web form because that
is integrated into the workflow of the groups that respond to those
reports.
Why isn't abuse@ integrated into the w
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 09:23:34AM -0400, Jeff McAdams wrote:
> We would prefer, but don't require, that you use the web form because that
> is integrated into the workflow of the groups that respond to those
> reports.
Why isn't abuse@ integrated into the workflow? It darn well should be,
(a)
This entire thread could easily have been simply :
"Hey all! I'm having some challenges reaching a live person in the abuse
groups for X, Y, and Z. Can anyone help with a contact, or if anyone from
those companies sees this, can you contact me off-list?"
Calling everyone an idiot in the midst of
On 2019-03-18 23:24, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
In message
,
Eric Kuhnke wrote:
Looking at the AS adjacencies for Webzilla, what would prevent them
from
disconnecting all of their US/Western Euro based peers and transits,
and
remaining online behind a mixed selection of the largest Russian A
(Disclosure: I, too, work for DigitalOcean as the Manager of Network
Engineering. Nikolas does not work for me, nor I for him.)
On Tue, March 19, 2019 02:17, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
> Nikolas Geyer wrote:
>> I have passed your email on to the relevant team within DO to have a
>> look at.
28 matches
Mail list logo
