Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP

On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 11:05:40 -0400, Prasun Dey said: > I’ve seen from PeeringDB that every ISP reveals its traffic ratio as Heavy/ > Mostly Inbound or Balanced or Heavy/ Mostly Outbound. > I’m wondering if there is any specific ratio numbers for them If they're an ISP that sells to end user

Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP

Hello,   Many years ago I read somewhere that the ratio between inbound & outbound traffic we used to see at that time was going to change in the future, the reasons they mentioned at that time was because the applications would change their behavior, things like: Dropbox, Gdrive and others would

Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP

Pure ISP is heavy inbound. Pure hosting is heavy outbound. The other categories are for people that have both types of business or who sell transit to both types of business. You are being asked what kind you are most. Regards Baldur ons. 19. jun. 2019 18.50 skrev Prasun Dey : > Hello, >

Re: few big monolithic PEs vs many small PEs

Hi Adam, Depends on how big of a router you need for your "small PE". Taking Juniper as an example, the MX204 is pretty unbeatable cost wise if you can make do with its 4*QSFP28 & 8*SFP+ interfaces. There's a very big gap between the MX204 and the first chassis based router in the MX lineup,

RE: Traffic ratio of an ISP

I’m heavy inbound. Which I think is characteristic of a stub-AS with lots of resi/busi bb ... no transit… just a lot of people looking at stuff. Inbound is of course from the perspective of traffic coming into my AS -Aaron

Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP

Yes, you seem to misunderstand (at least of what I understand). PeeringDB has categories of ratios to choose from. What has the community decided is acceptable ratios for each category? It's fairly trivial for any network to determine what their ratio is as a number, but not necessarily as a

Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP

>my question was more like to understand when an ISP decides to claim itself as any of these (Heavy Outbound/ Inbound or Balanced) Maybe I'm missing something but it's as simple as looking at the interface graphs. We see a whole lot of green for inbound and a little little blue line for

few big monolithic PEs vs many small PEs

Hi folks, Recently I ran into a peculiar situation where we had to cap couple of PE even though merely a half of the rather big chassis was populated with cards, reason being that the central RE/RP was not able to cope with the combined number of routes/vrfs/bgp sessions/etc.. So this made me

RE: Traffic ratio of an ISP

I run an eyeballs/isp network for about ~50,000 subscribers, and I see about 1:10 ratio at peak time. Last night ~4.5 gbps out, ~45 gbps in. But, I do have local caching of 4 big name cdn cache providers, so that might alter the 1:10 ratio I see on my actual inet links (which do not include

Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:50 AM Prasun Dey wrote: > I’m a Ph.D. candidate from University of Central Florida. I have a query, I hope you can help me with it or at least point me to the right direction. > I’ve seen from PeeringDB that every ISP reveals its traffic ratio as Heavy/ Mostly Inbound or

Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP

It kinda depends on the application that's being used. For example, videogaming has a ratio somewhere around 1:2.5 since you're only transmitting metadata about the players environment across the wire. The actual video is typically rendered at the end user's side. So it's not very bandwidth

Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP

If you're asking an ISP, consumers will always be inbound. It's the end user. The outbound would be where the information is coming from, like data centers. I'm not sure you're going to get any better answer without a more specific question. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct:

Traffic ratio of an ISP

Hello, Good morning. I’m a Ph.D. candidate from University of Central Florida. I have a query, I hope you can help me with it or at least point me to the right direction. I’ve seen from PeeringDB that every ISP reveals its traffic ratio as Heavy/ Mostly Inbound or Balanced or Heavy/ Mostly

Re: BGP person from Bell Canada/AS577

* jab...@hopcount.ca (Joe Abley) [Wed 19 Jun 2019, 17:24 CEST]: On 19 Jun 2019, at 10:27, Mike Hammett wrote: I'm curious as to why someone would want to do this? My interest is education, not combative. In previous lives I have had great success simply talking to people at Akamai about

Re: BGP person from Bell Canada/AS577

On 19 Jun 2019, at 10:27, Mike Hammett wrote: > I'm curious as to why someone would want to do this? My interest is > education, not combative. In previous lives I have had great success simply talking to people at Akamai about where my customers' traffic was landing, and where would make

Re: BGP person from Bell Canada/AS577

I'm curious as to why someone would want to do this? My interest is education, not combative. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Jason Lixfeld" To: "NANOG" Sent: Wednesday, June 19,

BGP person from Bell Canada/AS577

Hello, I’m looking to make contact with someone at Bell Canada/AS577 who is able to perform BGP prefix filtering facing their on-prem Akamai caches. Normal sales rep and NOC channels are not producing any meaningful results so far. Thanks in advance!

Conterra Networks Contact

Does anyone have a contact for Conterra (https://www.conterra.com/ ) not much luck using their public phone numbers and email addresses? -- -- [image: Host4Geeks] Kushal R Chief Executive | Host4Geeks site: host4geeks.com email: kusha...@h4g.co skype: