> On Oct 12, 2019, at 12:22 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>
> How exactly is it punishment that BGP needs an AS number?
It’s not. I was objecting to the implication that if someone announces a prefix
that has not been transferred to their ownership it is fraudulent or shady, and
as a
In article you write:
>On 10/11/19 9:43 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>How distributed is the power on a typical HFC system in practice? I'm
>sure I'm missing some of them, but having walked out most of a small-ish
>(~2000 residences) city recently for a FTTx deployment, I think I only
>saw 2-3
> On Oct 11, 2019, at 9:43 PM, Matt Hoppes
> wrote:
>
> And this is why the distributed nature of small node’s is detrimental in an
> extended power outage.
>
> There is no practical way to back them up with power for an extended period
> of time.
This is why I’m concerned about a future
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, Michael Thomas wrote:
So I knew that telcos are required to battery backup pots, but are isp's
too? I have a dinky little provider who also provides pots, but i have never
been clear whether dsl stays up too in a blackout.
Of course generalizing all service providers isn't
On 10/11/19 07:16, Daniel Seagraves wrote:
This should not be just a “nitpick". AT announces our extremely legacy ARIN
allocation for us because we do not qualify to have an ASN, but I absolutely did not,
will not, and*have actively resisted attempts to* transfer the block to them. I would
5 matches
Mail list logo
