We bond 8 VDSL2 pairs together, so getting 500Mbps is easily possible if
they are close to the DSLAM.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 5:28 PM Ryland Kremeier
wrote:
> We provide between 250Mb/s and 1Gb/s fiber-to-the-home services to all our
> subscribers. We do not use VDSL.
>
> I personally do not
We provide between 250Mb/s and 1Gb/s fiber-to-the-home services to all our
subscribers. We do not use VDSL.
I personally do not have our services in my area yet as I live at the furthest
possible point to which we will expand. So until then I use Centurylink.
From: Matt Harris
Sent: Friday,
Can confirm. Currently on VDSL in rural Missouri, speed is capped at 5Mb/s, but
has the capability of 7.5Mb/s. All customers from the provider here are on VDSL.
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Matt Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 12:38 PM
To: Rod Beck
Cc: Nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: VDSL
On
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 7:40 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
> It's interesting to also think, when is good time to break things.
>
> CustomerA buys transit from ProviderB and ProviderA
>
> CustomerA gets new prefix, but does not appropriately register it.
>
> ProviderB doesn't filter anything, so it
Hello!
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:46 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 09:30, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> > How much performance impact should we expect with uRPF?
>
> Depends on the platform, but often it's 2nd lookup. So potentially 50%
> decrease in performance. Some platforms it
> On 19 Oct 2019, at 04:42, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 20:15, Lukas Tribus wrote:
>
>> This has the potential to brake things, because it requires symmetry
>> and perfect IRR accuracy. Just because the prefix would be rejected by
>> BGP does not mean there is not a
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 20:15, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> This has the potential to brake things, because it requires symmetry
> and perfect IRR accuracy. Just because the prefix would be rejected by
> BGP does not mean there is not a legitimate announcement for it in the
> DFZ (which is the exact
This is interesting but so many variables to unpack to determin what the
right solution is. What are the main goals of your org? What exact pain
points are you trying to fix?
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019, 8:28 AM Dario Renaud wrote:
> Hello,
>
> At my day job, we are considering going Full MVNO.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 8:46 AM Ryland Kremeier
wrote:
> Can confirm. Currently on VDSL in rural Missouri, speed is capped at
> 5Mb/s, but has the capability of 7.5Mb/s. All customers from the provider
> here are on VDSL.
>
I'm guessing from your email address that you get that from your
In the general case, I think, the FCC's enforcement branch actually
takes care of being a clearinghouse for this sort of problem...
according to my friend who used to do this for the FCC anyway.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 1:32 AM Brandon Martin wrote:
>
> On 9/30/19 10:38 PM, Brandon Martin wrote:
> problem I've run into is our IOS isn't supported
Not sure what you mean, like you can’t find the same exact version of IOS XRv
9000?
Surely going with similar XRv version to your production one would be much
closer than going with IOSv
adam
From: NANOG On Behalf Of rylandkremeier
> From: Saku Ytti
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 3:41 PM
>
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 15:15, wrote:
>
> > But as you can see A) and B) can easily be tested with a single DUT (or some
> small topology around it) using actual HW plugged in a loop with IXIA/Spirent
> testers.
>
> Snake
On 9/30/19 10:38 PM, Brandon Martin wrote:
> Anyone know a friendly contact at Comcast regarding possible RF leaks on
> their HFC plant? I'm not a Comcast customer, so I can't get in via front
> line support (not that it would probably do me much good, anyway), and I'm
> not looking to lodge a
>> So you are left with your regular inbound influence bag of tricks,
>> e.g. prepending towards Shaw.
>
> the primary inbound steering tool is selective advertisement of
> sub-prefixes
>
> i was shocked that the prepending presentation at ripe79 was blind to
> this
btw the ripe79 preso,
15 matches
Mail list logo
