On 10/30/19 10:10 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 10/30/19 6:13 AM, John Von Essen wrote:
I too love RTG, been using it forever, appears to handle interfaces
all the way up 10G.
I still use RTG. Not for graphing or anything fancy, just for polling
counters in a database to be queried by other
From my experience Project Clearwater is the most matured IMS Core solution.
http://www.projectclearwater.org/
Also has a commercial offering.
https://www.metaswitch.com/products/core-network/clearwater-ims-core
Good Luck!
Regards,
Andrew Paolucci
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday,
On 10/30/19 6:13 AM, John Von Essen wrote:
I too love RTG, been using it forever, appears to handle interfaces all
the way up 10G.
I still use RTG. Not for graphing or anything fancy, just for polling
counters in a database to be queried by other things. It's still useful
for raw numbers
Hi Matthew
There's a typical 10*SFP tray and less common 20* tray. Flexoptix,
Fiberstore and others retail these (as well as use them to protect
their transceivers in transit) or AliBaba gives lots of hits. Use a
tray per transceiver part number and keep them vertical in an
appropriately-sized
This was discussed in detail at commcon. Have a look at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HdGuCFQYMs=PLvNS4EBAxmJKz6E6PLCqBq0eB-KKB6HR0=21=0s
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:51 PM Dario Renaud
wrote:
> Hello Javier,
>
> Well, if we take a step back to goals, I would like first to point that
> going
I know that a number of people on this list use, and/or contribute to,
open source software tools (e.g., *RTG). As I outlined in my lightning
talk at the NANOG meeting last June, I’m collecting information about
what operators find useful/off-putting in the use, contribution to, and
Looking for a Google/GMail contact, off-list.
Eric
+1
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:03 AM Todd Underwood wrote:
> the relevant sentiment is: thanks for whitelisting a fixed number of them
> so i can block them.
>
On 2019-10-30 15:35, Matthew Huff wrote:
Any recommendations to keep track of different SFP and keep them
organized? Any storage boxes / trays designed for SFPs?
3D printed some, but i have small amounts.
Like this one: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2855165
There is many more designs, for
Another thing to consider is how long it takes to download into forwarding
hardware.
Forwarding hardware is optimized for forwarding, not programming.
The programming has to wait for time slots when forwarding is not using the
memory.
When you do smart aggregation, a single changed route could
Hi Nick,
At the time MRTG was the thing that everyone was using and the way it handled
numbers and how it stored those numbers made it challenging to use for our use
case.
The things that we like about RTG are that it collects raw (non-smoothed)
numbers (usage) and it stores those numbers in
the relevant sentiment is: thanks for whitelisting a fixed number of them
so i can block them.
t
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:42 AM Royce Williams
wrote:
> The difference is that Chrome won't use resolvers other than the ones
> you've configured yourself, and will simply opportunistically
The difference is that Chrome won't use resolvers other than the ones
you've configured yourself, and will simply opportunistically upgrade to
DoH if they detect that those resolvers support it.
In other words, there is no usurpation of administrative intent.
Royce
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 7:30
It's not clear to me whether Paul is expressing approval of the whole shebang
at this point, or just the one change they've made, but, just on first look,
I don't think that change addresses *my* distaste for DoH, as discussed in
last month's 100-poster. :-)
I've been doing the nice plastic trays from fs.com as well as a sharpie on
the side (bidi, mm, sm, distance, etc)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 9:54 AM Warren Kumari wrote:
> If you buy your SFPs from
It seems that many participants of the Equinix Miami Exchange (formerly
Nap of the Americas NOTA) are unaware of the required IP renumbering.
Init7 AS13030 sees at least 50% of the new BGP sessions still down.
While the usefulness of the replacement of the peering mesh /23 with
another /23 could
We have ones from FS with our own logo on them and don’t pay any more (or
marginally so), so I’m sure it’d trivial for FS to make a label that included a
bar code for the PN or whatever you wanted, really.
> On Oct 30, 2019, at 10:10 AM, Luke Guillory wrote:
>
> Barcodes on FS.com is the
We use a few of these.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000LDH3JC/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o02_s00?ie=UTF8=1
We label the fronts with address label's for each PN.
https://i.imgur.com/iDTNVJ9.jpg
Luke Guillory
Vice President – Technology and Innovation
Tel:985.536.1212
Fax:
I’m wondering if the barcodes on the SFPs would let you simplify things
a bit more vs. updating a spreadsheet. IE: Some sort of barcode
scanner app for your phone that could automagically add/remove from some
sort of document or database?
Barcode is likely to just be the serial #, not model
Barcodes on FS.com is the serial, so you'd need to receive them in or enter
them with PN and SN.
Ns
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 9:03 AM
To: Warren Kumari
Cc: NANOG mailing list
I’m wondering if the barcodes on the SFPs would let you simplify things a bit
more vs. updating a spreadsheet. IE: Some sort of barcode scanner app for
your phone that could automagically add/remove from some sort of document or
database?
> On Oct 30, 2019, at 9:53 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
If you buy your SFPs from fs.com, they come in a nice organizer -- and
if you buy less than a tray full, you still get a tray.
I keep spares in the trays, labeled on the outside -- I then put the
trays in a cheap toolbox / fishing tackle box, and list what's in each
one in a Google spreadsheet.
Any recommendations to keep track of different SFP and keep them organized? Any
storage boxes / trays designed for SFPs?
I too love RTG, been using it forever, appears to handle interfaces all the way
up 10G.
Out of curiosity, are you hitting an issue that requires updating?
I get it, there are many options now, but back in the day, RTG was so simple
and so useful, its a testament to the original product. Its a
Drew Weaver wrote on 30/10/2019 12:25:
We’ve been using this product for years and years
http://rtg.sourceforge.net/ to collect and store SNMP statistics.
It has been working fine for us. I haven’t really been able to find much
information about forks, new versions, and development happening
Hello,
We've been using this product for years and years http://rtg.sourceforge.net/
to collect and store SNMP statistics.
It has been working fine for us. I haven't really been able to find much
information about forks, new versions, and development happening on it.
A while back I heard that
26 matches
Mail list logo
