The OUI prefixes that are Intel, Dell, HP, Supermicro and other x86-64
hardware vendors are almost certainly people running BIRD, FRR or similar
on commodity hardware. In which case the actual routing configuration could
be almost anything, those just happen to be the PCI-Express NICs in some
sort
Seems logically similar to the reason why there are landing stations, but
no noteworthy datacenters on the Oregon coast. Everything goes in various
ring topology paths to Hillsboro/Portland. And routes that go more directly
east to meet the fiber huts on long haul routes Portland-Sacramento.
Does anyone have any more information on this?
Users on Twitter report that T-Mobile said "that there is a known issue of
texts being resent/spoofed and said not to worry about it."
https://twitter.com/ThelocalfilmMN/status/1192434609197375488
That would be AS42009 at LINX Manchester.
I presume it's either something emulating a DEC Tulip Ethernet chip or a fake
MAC address (AA:00:00).
Edward Dore
Freethought Internet
From: Aled Morris
Sent: 07 November 2019 20:08
To: Edward Dore
Cc: Sabri Berisha
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 19:59, Edward Dore <
edward.d...@freethought-internet.co.uk> wrote:
> I just grabbed the following from our routers connected to LINX LON1, LINX
> LON2, LINX Manchester and LONAP (so this data is very UK centric):
>
...
>1 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
>
Kudos to
I just grabbed the following from our routers connected to LINX LON1, LINX
LON2, LINX Manchester and LONAP (so this data is very UK centric):
557 Cisco Systems, Inc
553 Juniper Networks
51 Routerboard.com
51 Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.
49 Arista Networks
40 Unknown
38 Intel
LINX has the mac addresses of their LANs public.
https://portal.linx.net/members/list-ip-asn?columns=asn+mac_addresses+short_name+website==
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:26 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
> MAC Addresses may cross into fear of disclosure of private identifying
> information.
>
> All they
MAC Addresses may cross into fear of disclosure of private identifying
information.
All they really need is the OUI portion of the MAC addresses which is fairly
anonymous in terms of identifying anyone specific, yet provides all the needed
data.
Owen
> On Nov 7, 2019, at 11:08 , Sabri
Hi,
What you could consider is asking a few of the major internet exchanges if
they'd be so kind to send you a list of MAC addresses seen on their LANs. Based
on the MAC you can determine the manufacturer. If you have three or four big
ones, you have a decent sample size as most larger
Hello,
Anybody from Equinix willing to help me out with an issue in Hong Kong?
Please contact me off-list. Thanks.
-Hank Disuko
It recently changed from being a handful of IXPs to testing to a server that’s
in the same building as one of 40+ ASNs:
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-360069A1.pdf (page 35ff)
The concern is that many RLEC buy transit from “Tier 2” providers that may are
not on that list of
Anyone have a contact at L3/CL that can deal with IP reassignment
issues? The tech contact email is dead air, and phone support has been
tepid at best.
I have a block that needs to be moved to another OrgID/POC.
Thanks,
Justin H.
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 14:36, Rakesh M wrote:
>
>
> Hi Nanog,
>
>
> We want to Deploy and use FRR for Route reflection on a Dell Edge. Any one
> has expereience with it and can give insight into number of routes and scale
> that you used FRR to do Route Reflection
There is possibly no better
Hi Nanog,
We want to Deploy and use FRR for Route reflection on a Dell Edge. Any one
has expereience with it and can give insight into number of routes and
scale that you used FRR to do Route Reflection
--
Rakesh Madupu
2xJNCIE - SP/DC / CCIE-SP#47613
https://r2079.wordpress.com
What about diversity from Ashburn?
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 13:50 Ethan O'Toole wrote:
> > hey there,
> > we've put together a blog post about Virginia beach developments and how
> it can reshape some of the ways we
> > have been designing our networks.
> >
15 matches
Mail list logo
