I was neither defending, nor advocating the placement, merely attempting to
document some of the history.
Owen
> On Nov 15, 2019, at 15:20 , Javier J wrote:
>
> I would think that just a few extra fractions of a second from the cable
> station to a DC/IX are better than a DC/IX near the
My mistake, I was also wrong about the landing site location being there, I
located the site using city permitting information It's 6KM away at a local
beach(woodbine).
Regards,
Andrew Paolucci
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, November 15, 2019 6:42 PM, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
>
Crosslake does not use the Enwave cooling pipes to enter 151 Front.
Torix is at 151 Front, but 151 Front is not Torix.
At 06:35 PM 15/11/2019, Andrew Paolucci via NANOG wrote:
Fresh water might not be in your scope for the
article, but I believe crosslakefibre.ca
operates a link across Lake
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 2:05 PM Mark Thompson wrote:
> Can anyone share a contact at Netflix who can help work through this?
Mark,
csrev...@dvd.com should be able to assist. (geosupp...@netflix.com
remains the correct contact for streaming geolocation issues.)
Regards,
Ryan Woolley
Netflix
Fresh water might not be in your scope for the article, but I believe
crosslakefibre.ca operates a link across Lake Ontario, Buffalo to Toronto at
TORIX 151 Front Street, but you'd need to verify with them if indeed the
landing comes directly into the facility, this may be the case though as
I would think that just a few extra fractions of a second from the cable
station to a DC/IX are better than a DC/IX near the beach where water can
wipe it all out. Preferably DC/IX should be on the 2nd or third floor IMHO
on some islands.
- J
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 4:11 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
The conference may be over, but the hours of archived keynotes, talks,
panels, and recaps featured in Austin are just waiting to be explored.
Couldn't attend? No problem. We've gathered up all the very best of NANOG
77, just for you. Scroll on to learn more!
View Agenda
Some Caribbean islands had IXs in landing stations early on IIRC. Usually
before the island built it’s first datacenter.
Some of them were better/faster about moving to the datacenter once it was
established than others.
Owen
> On Nov 15, 2019, at 01:47 , Martijn Schmidt via NANOG wrote:
>
Check Jaguar Network https://www.jaguar-network.com/
From: "Rod Beck"
To: "North American Network Operators' Group"
Sent: Wednesday, 13 November, 2019 16:14:48
Subject: Marseille Colocation
Any suggestions on a good telecom hotel for a cloud provider in Marseille?
Interxion has a campus
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
On 15.11.2019 03:58, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Hey there
>
> I have been putting my thoughts on Infrapedia blog and sharing with
> folks like
>
> https://www.infrapedia.com/post/top20cities-datacenters
>
> I am working on a new article and this time my topic will be looking at
> cable landing
❦ 15 novembre 2019 09:33 +00, ERCIN TORUN :
> Generally chipset is what limits the scale (e.g. trident2 is 128k ipv4
> lpm https://docs.cumulusnetworks.com/cumulus-linux/Layer-3/Routing/ ).
> If you disable "zebra" daemon, FRR works only in control-plane then
> you would most likely have a
PPC-1 built by PIPE Networks, an Australian IX, fiber and carrier neutral colo
provider, uses a CLS in Cromer NSW (“Sydney”) that is also a PIPE data center.
Unfortunately PIPE got acquired by TPG and their IX platform is limping along
on life support these days.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov
Hi Adam,
The intention is not to put in the Data Plane at all but use it for control
functions and calculating optimal paths, we are happy with how FRR is
handling small network islands to Route traffic in Data Plane and wanted to
test this as a candidate for Hierarchical Route-Reflection at site
> ERCIN TORUN
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 9:34 AM
>
> Hello Rakesh,
>
> As James said, better to ask it at FRR mailing list.
>
> Generally chipset is what limits the scale (e.g. trident2 is 128k ipv4 lpm
> https://docs.cumulusnetworks.com/cumulus-linux/Layer-3/Routing/ ). If
> you
I think AMS-IX had an exchange in Mombasa in the SEACOM landing station at some
point, but that is gone now. I'm not sure about the exact reasons there but
someone here probably knows what happened.
There's also a big amount of carriers in the TATA landing station in Mumbai, it
is the
Hello Rakesh,
As James said, better to ask it at FRR mailing list.
Generally chipset is what limits the scale (e.g. trident2 is 128k ipv4 lpm
https://docs.cumulusnetworks.com/cumulus-linux/Layer-3/Routing/ ). If you
disable "zebra" daemon, FRR works only in control-plane then you would most
> On Nov 15, 2019, at 5:42 AM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> I can’t find a single cls that is a good peering spot
Correct. The optimum location for peering is at the center of population
density and the center of economic transaction density, since that minimizes
average cable lengths to users.
18 matches
Mail list logo
