> dear lazynet. is there a list, irc, slack, ... for ops in the
> southern bay area? need to find/discuss colo, hands, brains, ...
fwiw, in seattle, the SIX chatter list would be a good example.
randy
dear lazynet. is there a list, irc, slack, ... for ops in the southern
bay area? need to find/discuss colo, hands, brains, ... thanks.
randy
Digging a little deeper, it looks like Iran's blocking is more complex
than I've seen before.
Consumer/mobile networks appear nearly completely blocked.
However, many important business/financial networks and B2B traffic appear
operating normally.
I don't yet have good data about of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello, NANOG!
Thank you to all who have generously given your time to respond
publicly and privately. I have a long list of things to research
while configuring our shiny new Juniper routers. :) I'll summarize
to the list shortly.
Be well!
Rob,
DANOS is using FRR in the opensource version at least.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 1:15 PM Mike Hammett wrote:
> Chances are, if there was a decision to be made, UBNT made the wrong
> choice.
>
> That said, I've heard a lot of good about ZebOS. *shrugs*
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent
For an additional point of reference - I run two Edgerouter Pros with
multiple full tables (v4 and v6). One of them is fine, but one of them
crashes and reboots about once a week. I'm currently trying to replace
them, possibly with DANOS now that it's out.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:23 PM Brielle
On 11/18/2019 2:12 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Chances are, if there was a decision to be made, UBNT made the wrong choice.
That said, I've heard a lot of good about ZebOS. *shrugs*
Well, early on during the switch there was a few issues with the change.
For example, I had to fix the support
Do we have any ideas which prefixes are still accessible?
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:01 PM Scott Fisher wrote:
> One would hope so, but I am I sure they will just threaten their
> population on using it. Tyrannical regimes know no bounds.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott Fisher
> Team Cymru
>
> On 11/18/19
Chances are, if there was a decision to be made, UBNT made the wrong choice.
That said, I've heard a lot of good about ZebOS. *shrugs*
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Rubens Kuhl"
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 5:55 PM Brielle wrote:
> On 11/18/2019 1:31 PM, Jared Geiger wrote:
> > This past Friday, the code for DANOS was released as open source to the
> > Linux Foundation and published at https://github.com/danos
>
> This is pretty awesome news.
>
> From what I'm reading, it
On 11/18/2019 1:31 PM, Jared Geiger wrote:
This past Friday, the code for DANOS was released as open source to the
Linux Foundation and published at https://github.com/danos
This is pretty awesome news.
From what I'm reading, it looks like the commercial support options
will be able to use
This past Friday, the code for DANOS was released as open source to the
Linux Foundation and published at https://github.com/danos
AT bought the Vyatta product from Brocade and developed on the DPDK
Brocade Vyatta 5600 version. The software was renamed DANOS. So if it
performs like other DPDK
One would hope so, but I am I sure they will just threaten their
population on using it. Tyrannical regimes know no bounds.
Thanks,
Scott Fisher
Team Cymru
On 11/18/19 2:26 PM, Tony Wicks wrote:
>>Implementation specifics vary. Most rely on state control of consumer
> ISPs and implement a
--- t...@wicks.co.nz wrote:
From: "Tony Wicks"
I guess all these governments who like to control...
The wierd thing to me is the one thing governments are afraid
of is people talking to each other without restriction. Not
this or that, rather just people
>Implementation specifics vary. Most rely on state control of consumer ISPs and
>implement a variety of systems at that layer. Many also have chokepoints for
>>international connectivity as well.
I guess all these governments who like to control access so tightly are going
to be in a total
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:29 AM Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
> --- s...@donelan.com wrote:
> From: Sean Donelan
>
> Its very practical for a country to cut 95%+ of its Internet connectivity.
> Its not a complete cut-off, there is some limited connectivity. But for
> most ordinary individuals, their
--- s...@donelan.com wrote:
From: Sean Donelan
Its very practical for a country to cut 95%+ of its Internet connectivity.
Its not a complete cut-off, there is some limited connectivity. But for
most ordinary individuals, their communication channels are cut-off.
Doug, out of curiosity, what does Hulu do once they have classified your
IP ranges as "business class"? Charge customers a different rate? Offer
different content? Refuse service?
Doug McIntyre wrote on 11/18/2019 10:41 AM:
I've been offering residential and business ISP services for a long
Have you tried reaching out to ipad...@hulu.com?
—
Brian Ellwood
Senior Systems Engineer
INOC Data Centers
O: 518-689-4350
> On Nov 18, 2019, at 11:41, Doug McIntyre wrote:
>
> I've been offering residential and business ISP services for a long time.
>
> Hulu recently blocked my customers
It's a logical evolution as botnets became less of a tool for lulz and more
of a economic asset to certain segments of the world.
No sense launching an orbital strike where a garden hose will do the job
just as well.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 9:05 AM Tom Hill wrote:
> On 18/11/2019 13:50, Mike
I've been offering residential and business ISP services for a long time.
Hulu recently blocked my customers from accessing their service, because my
ARIN IP address blocks are "business class" instead of residential.
I've tried to find a contact for them as I am not a customer, the
Hi Rabbi,
a PoC quite a while ago with RioRey worked quite satisfying but we are
working with Arbor since a couple of years. It works okay and is
insanely expensive. Mostly because of the price I wouldn't recommend it
but I'm not sure if there is anything in the market technically on the
same
Peace,
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019, 4:51 PM Mike Hammett wrote:
> I would like the list to know that not all targets attract such large
> attacks.
>
It is not that easily predictable. E.g. in case of reflection DDoS
sometimes even the attacker has no good idea of how much of traffic s/he is
Though Iran's situation is hardly a new advent, it reminds me that
more and more countries seem to be going for the centralized
filter/control/kill option and what a sad development that is. It sure
seems like this is going to vastly change how inter-nation traffic (or
at least inter-continental)
Its very practical for a country to cut 95%+ of its Internet connectivity.
Its not a complete cut-off, there is some limited connectivity. But for
most ordinary individuals, their communication channels are cut-off.
https://twitter.com/netblocks/status/1196366347938271232
On 18/11/2019 13:50, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I would like the list to know that not all targets attract such large
> attacks. I know many eyeball ISPs that encounter less than 10 gig
> attacks, which can be reasonably absorbed\mitigated. Online gamers
> looking to boot someone else from the game
I would like the list to know that not all targets attract such large attacks.
I know many eyeball ISPs that encounter less than 10 gig attacks, which can be
reasonably absorbed\mitigated. Online gamers looking to boot someone else from
the game aren't generally committing >100 gigs of
Correct statement. You forgot one zero.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:48 AM Denys Fedoryshchenko <
nuclear...@nuclearcat.com> wrote:
> On 2019-11-18 04:23, Richard wrote:
> > I would say you are making some assumptions that are not fact based.
> > The OP is very knowledgeable and would not mince
On 2019-11-18 04:23, Richard wrote:
I would say you are making some assumptions that are not fact based.
The OP is very knowledgeable and would not mince words or waste
bandwidth. Let us see what he has to say in regards to your remarks.
He will be able to make this more clear once he has read
29 matches
Mail list logo
