No attachments to the ml, but I gotcha covered ;)
https://web.archive.org/web/20200109210214/https://noia.network/technology
--
Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 12:39 PM Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
> I'm attach
I'm attaching the original pic in case they will replace it.
The true knowledge would then be preserved!
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020, 11:05 PM Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
> This is the deadliest IPv6 packet structure infographics I've ever seen in
> my life.
>
> https://noia.network/assets/concept-basics.
Looks like my RIPE IPv6 trainings have done me no good. I'm definitely
going to complain.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020, 11:17 PM Matthew Petach wrote:
>
> Whoa...
>
> So IPv6 is just a segment routing wrapper around IPv4.
>
> !insert mandatory "I know kung fu" meme <-- here
>
> ^_^
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9,
Whoa...
So IPv6 is just a segment routing wrapper around IPv4.
!insert mandatory "I know kung fu" meme <-- here
^_^
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 12:07 PM Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
> This is the deadliest IPv6 packet structure infographics I've ever seen in
> my life.
>
> https://noia.network/assets
* wimcl...@gmail.com (William McLendon) [Thu 09 Jan 2020, 20:18 CET]:
thank you all for the rapid feedback and suggestions! since many
have asked for more detail, the specific prefix in question is
168.8.214.0/24.
The previous owner is still announcing 168.8.0.0/14. If you're
shooting holes
This is the deadliest IPv6 packet structure infographics I've ever seen in
my life.
https://noia.network/assets/concept-basics.jpg
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020, 7:29 PM Aistis Zenkevičius wrote:
> So, a bit like this then: https://noia.network/technology
>
> -Aistis
>
>
> -Original Message-
> Fr
thank you all for the rapid feedback and suggestions! since many have asked
for more detail, the specific prefix in question is 168.8.214.0/24. it is
currently being advertised; the customer just is not currently using it until
we can resolve this reachability issue. As a note, our RADB irr d
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 1:56 PM William McLendon wrote:
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> we have a downstream customer originating a more specific /24 prefix, and
> when they do so, traffic sourced from that /24 prefix to at least a subset of
> akamai ranges (at minimum the 184.27.24.0/22 block at this ti
It would likely be helpful if you indicate which /24 and which supernet
you're talking about so people can perhaps comment if it's something around
IRR, ROAs, what their views are of the block(s), etc.
--
Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E | also on Sig
Good afternoon,
we have a downstream customer originating a more specific /24 prefix, and when
they do so, traffic sourced from that /24 prefix to at least a subset of akamai
ranges (at minimum the 184.27.24.0/22 block at this time) are getting
blackholed somewhere along the path either to or f
Interested in this new fangled 'concensus' protocol .
ok not really. :)
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 12:00 PM Matt Corallo wrote:
> lol no that’s even worse. “We put routing on the blockchain to make it
> secure and scalable the two things blockchains generally aren’t, now
> please buy our t
>
> Will Cogent stop pestering the community with illicitly harvested
> contact information? Will they switch to more nefarious tactics? Who
> knows... Everyone likes having money, after-all.
>
>
But at least Cogent is not a security and/or anti-spam vendor (or is it?).
A security services company
On 08/01/2020 13:53, Joe Provo wrote:
>> This is a disproportionate response IMHO. $0.02
>>
>> YMMV,
>
> And mine certainly does. Well over a decade of documented
> misbehavior with requests for them to cease certainly makes
> this an appropriate response. I will always applaud an
> organizatio
lol no that’s even worse. “We put routing on the blockchain to make it secure
and scalable the two things blockchains generally aren’t, now please buy
our token “.
> On Jan 9, 2020, at 11:28, Aistis Zenkevičius wrote:
>
> So, a bit like this then: https://noia.network/technology
>
> -Ais
"noia" is Italian for boredom ... maybe these folks want to spice up life a
little :D
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 5:28 PM Aistis Zenkevičius
wrote:
> So, a bit like this then: https://noia.network/technology
>
> -Aistis
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG On Behalf Of Phil Pishioneri
> Se
Hello
In my opinion the "nice" way of breaking out QSFP into 10G is something
like this:
https://www.fs.com/de-en/products/43552.html
40GBASE-PLR4 to 10GBASE-LR Breakout Panel 1U Rack-Mount, 24x LC Quad, 12x
MTP Elite (0.35dB IL), Single Mode
You connect your QSFP module using a MTP cable to t
So, a bit like this then: https://noia.network/technology
-Aistis
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Phil Pishioneri
Sent: 2019 m. spalio 4 d., penktadienis 22:52
To: NANOG list
Subject: "Using Cloud Resources to Dramatically Improve Internet Routing"
[Came up in some digest
When you determine who thinks you're in the UK (and get resolution), let me
know what you did to make that happen so I can add it to the list.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
Fr
On 1/8/20 11:30 AM, William Herrin wrote:
Did this tax change unpredictably, or am I still safe saying it's
deceitful to add a fee for it on top of the advertised and contracted
service price?
IMO, there's no reason to expect this tax to be directly passed on to an
end customer just like there
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020, at 20:09, Randy Bush wrote:
> i am not a fiber/sfp/... geek, so clue bat please
>
> on my left, i have a delta 9020SL running arcos, female 40g qsfp
>
> on my right, i have incoming 10g 1310nm single mode from the seattle
> internet exchange. it is currently into a redstone
20 matches
Mail list logo
