Further follow up, there appears to be a high amount of congestion between
CenturyLink and Telia at their peering in California.
Wonder if there’s another major download event going on?
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 12, 2020, at 8:40 PM, Brielle wrote:
>
> Just a quick followup - someone
Just a quick followup - someone from DO contacted me offlist to check
into possible issues. I'm sorry for my really crappy wording in the
original message - had a long day.
Basic symptoms seem to be essentially a 'blackhole' somewhere between
CL/L3 and DO going to the SFO2 data center.
I
Anyone else seeing peering / connectivity / peering issues in San Jose
this evening?
To one of my servers at Digital Ocean in San Jose from CenturyLink
Boise, ID...
4 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms boi2-edge-04.inet.qwest.net [63.224.242.57]
514 ms14 ms18 ms
On 2020-02-12, at 20:45, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> Aren't most modern consoles on whether they're "on" or not? IE: It's not a
> full power up from a dead stop, 0 watts power usage.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/7528/the-xbox-one-mini-review-hardware-analysis/5
says two-digit standby power
On 2/12/20 11:48, Josh Luthman wrote:
In low power state, usually standby, they're connected to the network
and listen for requests to download a new title (bought online) or
updates. I know on the Xbox One side of things this feature is semi-off
by default as it turns the HDD off to save
My point was, the user has the option properly configured, but the console
still isn't updating until the console is turned on. I'm not implying that
it doesn't work, I'm simply stating that some users claim to have the
options configured properly but that updates are still not downloading w/o
It seems like spinning up the disk if there's an update would be trivial.
*shrugs*
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"
To: "Tom Deligiannis"
Cc: "Mike Hammett" , "NANOG
Once upon a time, Mike Hammett said:
> Aren't most modern consoles on whether they're "on" or not? IE: It's not a
> full power up from a dead stop, 0 watts power usage.
The Xbox One kind of does that - it can receive updates (both game and
OS) in that state, but it depends on other settings.
Because the disks are shut off by default in standby mode.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 2:53 PM Tom Deligiannis
wrote:
> Aren't most modern consoles on whether they're "on" or not? IE: It's not
>> a
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:33 AM Lukas Tribus wrote:
> > Therefore, if being down for several minutes is not ok, you
> > should invest in dual links to your transits. And connect those
> > to two different routers. If possible with a guarantee the
> > transits use two routers at their end and
>
> Aren't most modern consoles on whether they're "on" or not? IE: It's not
> a full power up from a dead stop, 0 watts power usage.
>
> I'd think they'd be able to come out of sleep mode on their own, download
> the update, then go back to sleep.
>
Xbox has this feature, but it doesn't work
In low power state, usually standby, they're connected to the network and
listen for requests to download a new title (bought online) or updates. I
know on the Xbox One side of things this feature is semi-off by default as
it turns the HDD off to save power, but it's still in standby in the sense
Aren't most modern consoles on whether they're "on" or not? IE: It's not a full
power up from a dead stop, 0 watts power usage.
I'd think they'd be able to come out of sleep mode on their own, download the
update, then go back to sleep.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing
On 2/12/20 11:31, Livingood, Jason wrote:
But I think folks are correct that the issue may be more that a given gaming
device was turned off at night (though no reason that device could not
pre-cache the content from the source). In any case, there should be a better
way to address this. The
(as an aside) Some of this timed & controlled distribution (by the content
originator) should be possible using IETF Content Delivery Network
Interconnection (CDNI) standards - see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/cdni/documents/. The initial RFC 6707 provides
some background -
--
On 2/11/20 6:41 PM, Tom Deligiannis wrote:
> There is a major update that has released today, how's everything
> looking for everyone?
---
Did anyone else notice a big traffic dip from noon to 8pm local time?
--
On 2/11/20 6:41 PM, Tom Deligiannis wrote:
> There is a major update that has released today, how's everything
> looking for everyone?
---
eyeball network here...
It shifted our traffic patterns to earlier peaks. It
On 2/12/20 10:02, Jared Mauch wrote:
When you see this please raise it to my attention. I can't promise a resolution
but will promise clarity in what is going on.
This was in May 2019 so what's done is done at this point, but I will
forward you the email offlist.
When you see this please raise it to my attention. I can't promise a resolution
but will promise clarity in what is going on.
I know some cities are problematic as we are moving cages or datacenter space
and have the usual related problems.
There is always something.
Sent from my iCar
>
The wheels of bureaucracy are certainly a problem. The largest peer on
our local exchange couldn't even get Akamai to complete a peering turn
up because whoever was working on the ticket on the Akamai side got
stuck on trying to set up the wrong location. And then months pass, it
never got
It would be really nice if the major CDNs had virtual machines small
network operators with very expensive regional transport costs could
spin up. Hit rate would be very low, of course, but the ability to
grab some of these mass-market huge updates and serve them on the
other end of the regional
On 2/12/20 11:56 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
I think security is probably the sticking point for this. Content
owners don't want anybody having direct access to their files, and as
more content is distributed over HTTPS, content distributors don't wany
anbody having access to their certificates.
Once upon a time, Brandon Martin said:
> I guess what I'm looking for is a more "standard product". Load
> this VM, tell it your preference for upstream use vs. hit rate, let
> it announce some routes into your network, and you take what you
> get. If you need more, presumably you have the
On 2/12/20 11:22 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
My experience is that they want to see lots of traffic growth to stay
interested. As companies get bigger the minimum bar to play keeps going
up, and anyone below that bar is stuck relying on transit. Fall below
the bar or don't show enough growth fast
On 2/12/20 8:36 AM, Aaron Gould wrote:
Netflix oca has it figured out, as my fill windows is during off-peak time, 2
a.m. - 6 am. and I think it's also configurable in the oca portal.
It's not fill, it's that people don't turn on their xbox or whatever
until after they get home from work
Netflix oca has it figured out, as my fill windows is during off-peak time, 2
a.m. - 6 am. and I think it's also configurable in the oca portal.
-Aaron
On 2/12/20 8:13 AM, Brandon Martin wrote:
It would be really nice if the major CDNs had virtual machines small
network operators with very expensive regional transport costs could
spin up. Hit rate would be very low, of course, but the ability to grab
some of these mass-market huge updates
On 2/12/20 10:59 AM, Dave Bell wrote:
Night-time for you is daytime for someone else.
This is very true, though I am curious what the international
demographics are like for COD in particular and many games in general.
I suspect a lot of them are at least somewhat regional.
I agree that
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 14:46, Brandon Martin
wrote:
> It would be nice if things could drop overnight to hopefully
> spread things out during the daytime lull some.
>
Night-time for you is daytime for someone else.
I agree that the folks pushing these massive data loads could be
considerate
Our CEO tweeted out a new platform peak yesterday which when you round it from
the many trailing 9’s is 140T.
https://twitter.com/TomLeightonAKAM/status/1227389107665592320
I want to ensure the bits get through with the least pain as possible.
I’m expecting more of the same in the future, so
We saw a higher load overnight, a little bit of a spike last night, but
really hard to tell overall with our traffic. Updates were still going
at 8am today. We run a local/regional WISP.
On 2/12/20 9:46 AM, Brandon Martin wrote:
On 2/11/20 6:41 PM, Tom Deligiannis wrote:
There is a major
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:22 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 23:09, Rod Beck
> wrote:
>
> > I am curious about the distinction about the flow versus non-flow
> architecture for data centers and I am also fascinated by the separate
> issue of WAN architecture for these
>
> Based
On 2/11/20 6:41 PM, Tom Deligiannis wrote:
There is a major update that has released today, how's everything
looking for everyone?
I run a couple distinct very small networks. Both are transit-only with
no direct peering or local caching and generally sub-gbps.
One set a new 1-min 95%
Has anyone else noticed a bit of a capacity or packet loss issue between Telia
and Level3 in Toronto?
In my specific case I was able to avoid it because I had a better route but it
appears that they are trying to push more traffic through that link than it can
handle.
Thanks,
-Drew
Good point Bryan... With my single 10 gig pegged out for a few hours sustained,
I guess it remains to be seen exactly how high that peak would go if I gave it
more capacity
-Aaron
- Original Message -
From: Bryan Holloway
To: Nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 07:59:20 -0500 (EST)
Is 10G enough? ;)
We just lit up several 100G Akamai links. Saved the day fo sho ... (this
time.)
On 2/11/20 8:26 PM, Aaron Gould wrote:
Huge! Big as ever. My aanp links are (were) pegged, seriously. I will
be contacting Akamai about lighting up an additional 10 gig link to my
local
36 matches
Mail list logo
