Yeah for our 40,000 ftth customers, I think 250M is our base package... we have
lots of folks with 500M or 1G
-Aaron
I think a better point might be that there are many points involved in the
network distribution of software. Each one of them is a source of congestion.
It could be the 10 meg last mile to the home. It could be the console with
single chain wireless at the opposite end of the house of the
On 2/14/20 1:24 PM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
U, it is 2020, not 2010. 100M, 200M, 400M or 1G is increasingly common for
home broadband. I’ve got 400M at home, could get 1G fiber for less than $100 if
I wanted it, and I’m in your average, run-of-the-mill Midwest city.
And there are plenty of
I know people who have 300 mb all the way up to gigabit in their home, they
still struggled with the update since the bottleneck wasn't the speed of
their internet connection.
Tom
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:41 PM Jeff Shultz wrote:
> Sure, some of them can get it. Some still have DSL because
Sure, some of them can get it. Some still have DSL because we haven't
gotten fiber that far out yet. Or they're in a rental/apartment where
the landlord won't let us put fiber.
Or some just don't want to pay for it.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:26 AM Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
>
> >>> After all - it's
>>> After all - it's not like *they* are going to feel the pain of a single
>>> 106G upload, it's somebody else who feels the pain of 5 million downloads
>>> of a 106G image
>>> refresh.
>>>
>>> Economists call this sort of thing an "externality".
>>
>> I must admit, I'm blissfully unaware of
Hi NANOG,
We have often read that CDNs/CSPs optimize their networking stack
configurations (e.g., TCP, HTTP etc.) to meet their performance/service
requirements.
Please help us in exploring the configurations used in the wild by filling
us this short survey (<10 minutes): CDN network
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 1:47 AM t...@pelican.org wrote:
>
> On Friday, 14 February, 2020 09:17, "Valdis Klētnieks"
> said:
>
> > After all - it's not like *they* are going to feel the pain of a single 106G
> > upload,
> > it's somebody else who feels the pain of 5 million downloads of a 106G
All,
There has been some initial discussions about beyond 400G for Ethernet. It
would be interesting to better understand how often this problem is now
occurring - because I would imagine the problem is only going to get worse as
the "binary blob" blobs out, which will only stress networks
and?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Beecher"
To: "Carsten Bormann"
Cc: "Mike Hammett" , nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 5:31:49 AM
Subject: Re: akamai
On Friday, 14 February, 2020 09:17, "Valdis Klētnieks"
said:
> After all - it's not like *they* are going to feel the pain of a single 106G
> upload,
> it's somebody else who feels the pain of 5 million downloads of a 106G image
> refresh.
>
> Economists call this sort of thing an
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 09:39:09 -0800, Ahmed Borno said:
> The thread started with bandwidth surges and now power hogging is
> mentioned, I wonder what else might happen as a side effect to a small
> number of console/gaming companies not taking a direct responsibility in
> how they release large
13 matches
Mail list logo
