On 2020-04-18, at 03:08, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
> 24x7x365 thus means every hour of 7 years. YES, I know, I know.
Clearly, it means the NOC only operates in the seven years of great abundance
that precede the seven years of famine (Genesis 41:29 etc.). I think I have
seen such NOCs before :-
Rich. I am truly sorry. 💖 also this was great thank you.
-Ben
> On Apr 17, 2020, at 6:09 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
> (since it's Friday and we're all stressed)
>
> I can't believe that out of everything I wrote that we're going to discuss
> the semantics of this, but then again: yes I can.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 6:09 PM Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> 24x7 means every hour of the week, as in "24 by 7".
>
> 24x365 means every hour of the year. (modulo those with 366 days
> but please let's not go there because this is bad enough)
> (oh wait, too late, someone upthread already
(since it's Friday and we're all stressed)
I can't believe that out of everything I wrote that we're going to discuss
the semantics of this, but then again: yes I can. I should have known.
I should have known. I. Should. Have. Known. *bangs head on desk*
*reaches for scotch* Alrighty then:
24
From version 6.3.1, IOS XR supports "if community length" in route-policy.
Regards,
Jakob.
-Original Message-
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:29:33 +0100
From:
On the point of as-path length limit, Yes I know of at least one tier-1 that
does it and since I left some 8 years back I do it ever
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@li
On 16 Apr 2020, at 22:35, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> 
>
>> On 15/Apr/20 19:07, Saku Ytti wrote:
>>
>>
>> Don't run Cisco ORR RR or have IGP next-hops :/
>
> Does it break NEXT_HOP=self in Cisco-land?
>
> Mark.
We’re testing ORR at the moment as part of core upgrades (XRv on ESXi), and
next-ho
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:33:58PM -0400, Ross Tajvar wrote:
> Can you give some examples of the things you mention above? I'm not doing
> much in terms of customer filtering and would be interested to hear what
> others consider best practice.
Sure. These are just examples and are by no means ex
> Christopher Morrow
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 2:51 AM
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 7:38 PM Brandon Martin
> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/13/20 4:31 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > > it seems a lot of folk think prepending acrually works.
> >
> > I mean, there's prepending and then there's prepending 50+ t
On 4/17/2020 2:01 AM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>
> I thought we were talking about control traffic.
I expect there will be a TCP control traffic option.
I expect there will continue to be a UDP control traffic option.
These are "mechanisms", there will be a reasonable default policy (that
will ch
Hi all.
I'm almost there getting IS-IS to work without issue. I'm now faced with
the following error log:
2020/04/17 10:02:01 ISIS: IS-IS bpf: could not transmit packet on em0:
Input/output error
2020/04/17 10:02:01 ISIS: [EC 67108865] ISIS-Snp (1): Send L2 PSNP on
em0 failed
This repeats every
I thought we were talking about control traffic.
If you want to do some NTP time comparison mode with larger responses
than requests, I agree that TCP is likely not a good option.
Ragnar
> On 17 Apr 2020, at 10:44, Harlan Stenn wrote:
>
> NTP uses UDP for time.
>
> I'm not sure what you're
NTP uses UDP for time.
I'm not sure what you're talking about.
H
On 4/17/20 1:32 AM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>
>
>> On 17 Apr 2020, at 01:28, Harlan Stenn wrote:
>>
>> I found this as an unsent draft - I hope I didn't send it before.
>>
>> On 3/30/2020 2:01 AM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>>>
>>>
>
> On 17 Apr 2020, at 01:28, Harlan Stenn wrote:
>
> I found this as an unsent draft - I hope I didn't send it before.
>
> On 3/30/2020 2:01 AM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 08:18, Saku Ytti wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 01:58, Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>>>
>>
14 matches
Mail list logo
