On Monday, 21 September, 2020 16:16, Randy Bush wrote:
>> I'm not sure what you're saying here, I never said MPLS VPNs are
>> secure, only private. I hope others recognise that they are
>> different concepts.
>yes, privacy is one aspect of security. and, as mpls vns are not
>private sans encry
On 9/21/20 7:28 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Can we please send this stuff to the admins and not the whole list?
Both the list admin account in the headers and the ge...@nanog.org is
monitored and responded to. If you don't get a reply, you all have my email
too.
What's happening here is a subscr
On 9/21/20 11:03 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
Reminder: forwarding these sorts of things (with full headers please) to:
nanog-spamm...@firemountain.net
will cause them to be compiled into a list.
Why not a nanog.org address?
Is this simply being aggregated by a NANOG member / subscriber
Can we please send this stuff to the admins and not the whole list?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Boyd"
To: "NANOG"
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 6:20:31 PM
Subject: Just
Apparent MS-Word doc attached. Be careful out there.
Return-Path:
Received: from cross6.lu-visp.net (cross6.lu-visp.net [62.182.179.184])
by lenny.gizmopartners.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 08LJIMld018071
for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:18:25 GMT
Message-Id: <202009211918.08ljimld0
Hi Randy,
> On 22 Sep 2020, at 00:14, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> I already taught my SpamAssasin and then deleted them
>
> :0
> * ^From:.*@csvwebsupport.com
> | /usr/bin/mail -s 'Screw You' dating.supp...@csvwebsupport.com <
> ~/screw-you.txt
I’m using different technique. I like tarpitting such
james,
> I'm not sure what you're saying here, I never said MPLS VPNs are
> secure, only private. I hope others recognise that they are
> different concepts.
yes, privacy is one aspect of security. and, as mpls vns are not
private sans encryption, they are not secure.
randy
> I already taught my SpamAssasin and then deleted them
:0
* ^From:.*@csvwebsupport.com
| /usr/bin/mail -s 'Screw You' dating.supp...@csvwebsupport.com <
~/screw-you.txt
Call me old, but I miss the days when this thread was still on the SRv6 rails.
Can we get back the proper bashing to match this thread title?
-Shep
> On Sep 21, 2020, at 13:54, James Bensley wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19 September 2020 03:23:15 BST, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> Information can be in pla
On 19 September 2020 03:23:15 BST, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Information can be in plaintext and private
>
>Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead. -- franklin
>
>i know you truely believe the tunnel k00laid. the security
>community does not.
Hi Randy,
I'm not sure what you're saying h
Job,
I already taught my SpamAssasin and then deleted them, and my
Postfix is no longer taking submission from the IP from which they
were sent - 216.176.196.72.
They seem to be using correct sending host according to SPF
record (host spamtitan.csvwebsupport.com validates using
'dating.supp...@cs
On 21/09/2020 19:38, Randy Bush wrote:
> newspeak -- 1984
colloquialism
/kəˈləʊkwɪəlɪz(ə)m/
noun: a word or phrase that is not formal or literary and is used in
ordinary or familiar conversation.
--
Tom
> One thing that is true: not all present or historical definitions
> (or acceptable uses) of the word "private" strictly imply or infer
> privacy.
newspeak -- 1984
On 19/09/2020 03:23, Randy Bush wrote:
> i know you truely believe the tunnel k00laid. the security
> community does not.
At this point, I'm beginning to think that you're trolling us with the
assertion(s) that the 'P' in "Virtual Private Network" has obviously
meant "Privacy" all along, and/or t
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:45:32PM -0400, Dovid Bender wrote:
> Is anyone starting to get the "cogent emails" again?
Reminder: forwarding these sorts of things (with full headers please) to:
nanog-spamm...@firemountain.net
will cause them to be compiled into a list.
---rsk
The NANOG Program Committee is preparing a solid program for NANOG 80,
which will take place online October 19-21.
Sessions will be held each day of the conference, from 12pm to 5pm EDT
Monday through Wednesday, and will feature a variety of presentations,
networking sessions, and BoFs on the late
On 21/Sep/20 12:47, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
NANOGers,
Have you got email from 'dating.supp...@csvwebsupport.com’ immediately
after you post to nanog@? First time I thought it’s coincidence, but
today when I got it, it’s hardly one ;)
Topic is '[#WHB-257-41491]: Re: XX’ where is sub
Dear Łukasz, others,
Can you please send any suspecious emails (including headers) to
the mailing list admin team at ge...@nanog.org?
We'll try to figure out if it happens through an existing subscription.
Kind regards,
Job
(hat: NANOG geeks)
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:51:44PM +0200, Octolus D
I did yeah, annoying.
Best Regards,
Octolus
On 9/21/2020 12:50:54 PM, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
NANOGers,
Have you got email from 'dating.supp...@csvwebsupport.com’ immediately
after you post to nanog@? First time I thought it’s coincidence, but
today when I got it, it’s hardly one ;)
Topic is '
NANOGers,
Have you got email from 'dating.supp...@csvwebsupport.com’ immediately
after you post to nanog@? First time I thought it’s coincidence, but
today when I got it, it’s hardly one ;)
Topic is '[#WHB-257-41491]: Re: XX’ where is subject taken
from last e-mail.
I understand there’s
Mark,
> On 20 Sep 2020, at 13:02, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19/Sep/20 22:53, Valdis Kl ē tnieks wrote:
>
>> Are there any actual countries heading that way? Seems like most of them
>> insist
>> they have the ability to snoop unencrypted traffic (where "crypto that has a
>> baked-in
>> b
21 matches
Mail list logo
