A great deal of this discussion could be resolved by the use of a $20
in-line 120VAC watt meter [1] plugged into something as simple as a $500 1U
server with some of the DPDK-enabled network cards connected to its PCI-E
bus, running DANOS.
Characterizing the idle load, average usage load, and abso
First, take a look at this:
https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/18894
Now look at these (or use your own BGP table analysis tools):
https://bgp.he.net/AS18894
https://stat.ripe.net/18894
The claimed prefixes announced, traffic levels and POPs appear to have no
correlation with reality in global v4/
Rejected with what error codes?
Let’s carry this off list ... can you send through the full headers ?
--
J. Hellenthal
The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> On Mar 4, 2021, at 11:11, jimmy keffer wrote:
>
> i
*TL;DR - DPDK applications embody the phrase caveat emptor.*
As Robert Bays put it: "Please ask your open source dev and/or vendor of
choice to verify."
On the other hand, I do not recommend taking the following (citing Robert
Bays again) for granted:
"But the reality is [open source projects and
i have a server that use gmail for smtp it working excpt its rejecting
my logwatch reports other mail is sending fine the reject page at
google is no help
thanks jimmy
Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 09:18:06PM +0700, Pirawat WATANAPONGSE via NANOG:
> For a “second validator”, which choice is better: second copy of the same
> software, or different software altogether?
Arrcus ArcIQ has a validator, RTR server, and has monitoring capabilities
and support.
6 matches
Mail list logo
