Hey Michael,
> If accurate interface stats are important to you, MX’s don’t support accurate
> SNMP Interface Utilization, ie they don’t comply with RFC2665/3635, which
> seems like a fairly basic thing to do but they decided not to, and has been
> impactful to me in the past. So, any SNMP mon
On 5/15/21 10:38, Saku Ytti wrote:
Not sure why 76 is better than 24. Both are wrong and will cause
operational confusion because people think the link is not congested.
This is extremely poorly understood even by professionals, so poorly
that people regularly think you can't get 100% utilisa
On Sat, 15 May 2021 at 13:00, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Because end users will demand compensation and lawyer time for only
> getting 195Mbps on their 200Mbps service. 195Mbps is not 200Mbps.
Customers and operators both have very little idea what they are
doing. Most people have no idea what the poli
Dear REACH admins,
>From the email address in Merit’s IRR Directory [Reference:
http://www.irr.net/docs/list.html#REACH ],
I contacted you at dbad...@telstraglobal.net regarding taking-down a fake
IRR entry of my prefix [original email attached below],
but got the response from Gmail saying that
4 matches
Mail list logo
