Re: A crazy idea

2021-07-29 Thread Frank Habicht
Hi, On 30/07/2021 07:58, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:> ... > Consider this… I discussed this topic at length with JJB (COMCAST at > the time) and pushed hard on why they don’t give /48s to their > residential customers. His answer was that if they did so, they would > need to get a /12 from their

Re: A crazy idea

2021-07-29 Thread Owen DeLong via NANOG
> On Jul 19, 2021, at 06:04 , Stephen Satchell wrote: > > On 7/19/21 5:41 AM, Feldman, Mark wrote: >> What you propose is not outlandish; some ISPs have been dual stack >> and providing some combination of these services for years. They >> already provide IPv6 ip6.arpa delegations should thei

Re: russian prefixes

2021-07-29 Thread Denys Fedoryshchenko
On 2021-07-29 20:46, Randy Bush wrote: Looks like it did shown on news only. :) i wondered They have installed devices called "TSPU" on major operators. Isolation of specific networks is done without changing BGP announcements, obviously. And the drills do not mean at all "we will turn off t

Re: A crazy idea

2021-07-29 Thread Daniel Corbe
> On Jul 29, 2021, at 16:06, Joe Maimon wrote: > > > > t...@pelican.org wrote: >> On Monday, 19 July, 2021 14:04, "Stephen Satchell" said: >> >>> The allocation of IPv6 space with prefixes shorter than /64 is indeed a >>> consideration for bigger administrative domains like country >>> gov

Re: A crazy idea

2021-07-29 Thread Joe Maimon
t...@pelican.org wrote: On Monday, 19 July, 2021 14:04, "Stephen Satchell" said: The allocation of IPv6 space with prefixes shorter than /64 is indeed a consideration for bigger administrative domains like country governments, but on the other end, SOHO customers would be happy with /96, /1

Re: Anycast but for egress

2021-07-29 Thread Joe Maimon
Vimal wrote: (Unsure if this is the right forum to ask this question, but here goes:) From what I understand, IP Anycast can be used to steer traffic into a server that's close to the client. I am curious if anyone here has/encountered a setup where they use anycast IP on their gateways..

RE: [EXT] Re: russian prefixes

2021-07-29 Thread Jacques Latour
Perhaps it's the result of a successful table top exercise 😉 > -Original Message- > From: NANOG On > Behalf Of Randy Bush > Sent: July 29, 2021 1:47 PM > To: Alexandre Snarskii > Cc: North American Network Operators' Group > Subject: [EXT] Re: russian prefixes > > > Looks li

QVC.com Technical Contact

2021-07-29 Thread Nathan Gerencser
Looking for a contact, trying to clear up a reachability issue. Please reach out to me off-list. Thanks, Nathan Gerencser MetaLINK Technologies

Re: russian prefixes

2021-07-29 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 02:29:19PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-cuts-self-off-from-global-internet-tests-defenses-rbc-2021-7 > says "Russia disconnected itself from the rest of the internet, a test > of its new defense from cyber warfare, report says" > > did t

Re: russian prefixes

2021-07-29 Thread Randy Bush
> Looks like it did shown on news only. :) i wondered

Re: russian prefixes

2021-07-29 Thread Christopher Morrow
it is weird that no dyn/kentik/oracle/etc article appeared for the event, right? like.. did they not pull routes, they just prevented access in some other manner? On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 7:22 PM Baldur Norddahl wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:29 PM Randy Bush wrote: > >> >> https://www.

Re: Anycast but for egress

2021-07-29 Thread Vimal
Great point. We don't need geo-diversity for websites with the IP address issue, so we could design for that case specially on a one-off basis. For throughput it shouldn't be an issue where we're located, but we often find websites serving different content based on the source IP of the traffic.