Thank you, Tim.
I have often suggested that clear business purposes should drive implementation
of technology. Every cogent analysis of IPv6 shows that there are enough
addresses that we need not worry about running out of addresses for many
decades. Even swarms of devices should not seriously
Tommorrow, Wednesday, August 11, 2021 at 2:20 p.m. EDT the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will be testing the national emergency
alert system and wireless emergency alert system.
Most of the news reporting has tried to simplify things.
The Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) test on
Are you referring to mailing lists that lack some kind of added prefix to the
subject?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "C. A. Fillekes"
To: "NANOG mailing list"
Sent: Monday, August
There used to be (1990’s) a bunch of guys that were Interop volunteers, but
they also owned the Renaissance Fair in Novato, Ca. The company name on the
fair program as its owner was “The Society for Creative Anachronism.” I know
there used to be a fair amount of overlap between the NANOG
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 12:20 AM Robert Brockway
wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, C. A. Fillekes wrote:
>
> > telling the difference between their NANOG and SCA mail?
>
> Can't say that I do. I've been on NANOG for about 17 years. I used to be
> subscribed to over 100 technical lists. Despite
On 8/9/21 19:38, Tom Beecher wrote:
Folks can announce longer than 24 masks all day. They're unlikely to
propagate very far though, since most won't accept longer than 24 from
the world at large.
Been waiting for the day when /27's, /28's and /29's are going to make
it into the DFZ, as
Sabri Berisha wrote:
Just for fun, I did the math. A total of 16,777,216 /24s fit in 32
bits. Take away all the reserved space as per IANA (this is 1,266,696
/24s, see below),
> 240.0.0.0/41048576
I think we should also take away multicast addresses of
> 224.0.0.0/41048576
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, C. A. Fillekes wrote:
telling the difference between their NANOG and SCA mail?
Can't say that I do. I've been on NANOG for about 17 years. I used to be
subscribed to over 100 technical lists. Despite these two facts I have no
idea what you mean by SCA in this context.
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 17:47, Billy Croan wrote:
> Are there any big networks that drop or penalize announcements like this?
It's possible you could get your peering request denied for this. I
have put *reasonable* prefix aggregation into peering requirements for
some years now. If you are a
9 matches
Mail list logo
