The intricacies of Java are over my head, but I’ve been reading about this
Log4j issue that sounds pretty bad.
What do we know about this? What, if anything, can a network operator do to
help mitigate this? Or even an end user?
Andy Ringsmuth
5609 Harding Drive
Lincoln, NE 68521-5831
(402)
Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
> The double billing (had it been present at the time) would have prevented me
> from signing the LRSA for my IPv4 resources.
Owen, the root of your problem is that you signed an LRSA with ARIN,
rather than keeping your legacy resources un-tainted by an ARIN contract
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Gobal
IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...
https://www.mailop.org/
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Daly"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 7:42:50 AM
Subject: Assistance with Microsoft O36
https://www.mailop.org/
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Payam Poursaied"
To: "NANOG"
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:53:18 PM
Subject: Looking for a Microsoft con
On 12/10/21 6:42 AM, Tom Daly wrote:
Reaching out for help - having troubles with email delivery into O365
inboxes. Have done the requisite PTRs, SPF+DKIM work, domain
reputation, RBL checks, etc.
For some reason, this one is vexxing me. Anyone from Microsoft on the
list that could lend a hel
Hi NANOG'ers,
Reaching out for help - having troubles with email delivery into O365
inboxes. Have done the requisite PTRs, SPF+DKIM work, domain reputation,
RBL checks, etc.
For some reason, this one is vexxing me. Anyone from Microsoft on the list
that could lend a helping hand?
Thanks,
Tom
--
Mark Andrews wrote:
Just saying, facts are on my side. Check the number of times dnssec
caused an outage. Then check the number of hacks prevented by
dnssec. Literally 0.
How do you know? Unless you investigated every single time DNSSEC
validation returned bogus to get to the root cause you c
Arne Jensen wrote:
Because every authoritative RRset in a zone must be protected by a
digital signature, RRSIG RRs must be present for names containing a
CNAME RR. This is a change to the traditional DNS specification
[RFC1034], which stated that if a CNAME is present for a name
On 9 Dec 2021, at 1:57 PM, Randy Bush mailto:ra...@psg.com>>
wrote:
...
as i do not follow arin news, i found this even more interesting
The situation for ARIN’s IPv4/IPv6 customers will change in January,
when all customers with IPv4 and/or IPv6 number resources will pay on
the same fee table fo
On 9 Dec 2021, at 12:44 PM, heasley
mailto:h...@shrubbery.net>> wrote:
...
So, fees will be reduced, given all this new income?
The existing 7500 ISP customers fees are unchanged. For the more than 8000
end-users customers, the fee structure change means they will now pay the same
fees as ISPs
11 matches
Mail list logo
