On 1/14/22 19:04, Randy Bush wrote:
but, heck, we don't publish a list of pingables. so we're gonna get
random behavior.
Fair point.
Most of our customers are not interested in our on-net servers that they
can ping. They prefer to ping the usual suspects, because, well, that is
"the Int
On 1/14/22 18:47, Michael Thomas wrote:
Y'all are power hogs. We're at about 350 watts most of the time, and
even that bugs me.
When the kids leave the house in a few years, that footprint should come
down for us. It's amazing how much power a PS4 in full swing draws...
Then again, we
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global
IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...
> We do not recommend or advise customers to ping random online
> resources, however famous they may be. We don't want to be part of
> growing that problem for other networks.
i helped the shy admin of a well known site talk to an entire
politically sensitive country which had decided to ping that
On 1/13/22 8:22 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 1/13/22 17:56, Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG wrote:
I bought one of those power monitors and tossed it on the circuit
that goes into my house. At *night* when everything is off, I might
get down as far as ~800 watts.
During the day it's more like 2
5 matches
Mail list logo
