Re: FCC vs FAA Story

2022-06-05 Thread sronan
They had 5 years to do that, and didn’t start until the very last minute. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 5, 2022, at 8:41 PM, Doug Royer wrote: > >  > On 6/5/22 17:14, sro...@ronan-online.com wrote: >> They had 5 years, and did NOTHING. No amount of time would have changed that. >> >> Shane >>

Re: FCC vs FAA Story

2022-06-05 Thread Doug Royer
On 6/5/22 17:14, sro...@ronan-online.com wrote: They had 5 years, and did NOTHING. No amount of time would have changed that. Shane It is not that simple. And they have done a lot of work. Much more than NOTHING. These are primarily used in low visibility situations. How many crashed

Re: FCC vs FAA Story

2022-06-05 Thread sronan
They had 5 years, and did NOTHING. No amount of time would have changed that. Shane > On Jun 5, 2022, at 8:05 PM, Doug Royer wrote: > >  >> On 6/5/22 13:01, Miles Fidelman wrote: >> John Levine wrote: >>> It appears that Crist Clark said: ProPublica published an investigative report

Re: FCC vs FAA Story

2022-06-05 Thread Doug Royer
On 6/5/22 13:01, Miles Fidelman wrote: John Levine wrote: It appears that Crist Clark said: ProPublica published an investigative report on it last week, https://www.propublica.org/article/fcc-faa-5g-planes-trump-biden Whaddya know. Plenty of blame to go around. Government regulative bodies

Re: FCC vs FAA Story

2022-06-05 Thread John Levine
It appears that Miles Fidelman said: >> Harold Feld did a much better job in November: >> >> https://wetmachine.com/tales-of-the-sausage-factory/what-the-eff-faa-my-insanely-long-field-guide-to-the-faa-fcc-5g-c-band-fight/ >Well... a bit better look at the politics & motivations of the folks

Re: FCC vs FAA Story

2022-06-05 Thread Carsten Bormann
On 2022-06-05, at 22:01, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > Still doesn't address whether or not C band radios break radio altimeters. The discussion reminds me of the early 1990s, when mobile phones became pocketable. There was some talk about how emissions from mobile phones that people take into

Re: FCC vs FAA Story

2022-06-05 Thread Mike Hammett
It's nice to see the FCC take regulating receivers seriously, finally. It's a two way street and we've only been looking one direction the whole time. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message

Re: FCC vs FAA Story

2022-06-05 Thread Miles Fidelman
John Levine wrote: It appears that Crist Clark said: ProPublica published an investigative report on it last week, https://www.propublica.org/article/fcc-faa-5g-planes-trump-biden Whaddya know. Plenty of blame to go around. Government regulative bodies captured by the industries they’re

Re: FCC vs FAA Story

2022-06-05 Thread John Levine
It appears that Crist Clark said: >ProPublica published an investigative report on it last week, > >https://www.propublica.org/article/fcc-faa-5g-planes-trump-biden > >Whaddya know. Plenty of blame to go around. Government regulative bodies >captured by the industries they’re supposed to

Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

2022-06-05 Thread Dave Taht
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 9:12 AM Masataka Ohta wrote: > > Livingood, Jason via NANOG wrote: > > > That shows up as increased user demand (usage), which means that the > > CAGR will rise and get factored into future year projections. > > You should recognize that Moore's law has ended. > >

Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

2022-06-05 Thread Josh Luthman
Look up the Broadband Data Act and the FCC BDC. This will identify what individuals have service in ~6 months. On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 11:41 AM Sean Donelan wrote: > I wish (...) that public right of way agreements included a requirement > that service providers must publish accurate service