6762 became transit free some 15 years ago while I was still working there.
I’m unsure how you came up with this calculation, but I can promise you it’s
not correct.
Shane
> On Aug 1, 2022, at 9:38 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote:
>
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 12:11:07 -0400, William Allen Simpson
> wrote:
>
>
>> At our residence, the US mailbox is positioned near the recycli
On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 12:11:07 -0400, William Allen Simpson
wrote:
>At our residence, the US mailbox is positioned near the recycling bin.
>Bulk mail generally goes directly into recycling without being viewed.
>Sadly, receiver has to pay for recycling (via taxes).
The incremental cost of unwante
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 3:19 PM Geoff Huston wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 1 Aug 2022, at 11:10 am, Tom Paseka via NANOG wrote:
> >
> > Paying for "peering", doesn't stop you being a tier-1.
> >
> > Being a Tier-1 means you are "transit free" (technical term, not
> > commercial). No one is transiting your
> On 1 Aug 2022, at 11:10 am, Tom Paseka via NANOG wrote:
>
> Paying for "peering", doesn't stop you being a tier-1.
>
> Being a Tier-1 means you are "transit free" (technical term, not commercial).
> No one is transiting your routes to other Tier-1 providers.
>
There are a lot of potenti
Paying for "peering", doesn't stop you being a tier-1.
Being a Tier-1 means you are "transit free" (technical term, not
commercial). No one is transiting your routes to other Tier-1 providers.
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 11:04 AM Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Looking at the article on Tier 1 networks
Hi.
Looking at the article on Tier 1 networks, I found one that I know for a
fact that pays for some transit (12956) and some I usually don't associate
to Tier 1 status, like 6762.
Is there a list of such transit relationships by those bragging about being
Tier 1 ?
Rubens
7 matches
Mail list logo
