John Curran wrote:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-240/
>
> ... this Internet draft ... can't be safely deployed in the actual
> real-world Internet
The draft *has been* safely deployed in the actual real-world Internet.
It is in all Linux nodes since 2008, and al
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:05 PM David Conrad wrote:
>
> Barry,
>
> On Nov 21, 2022, at 3:01 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
>
> We've been trying to get people to adopt IPv6 widely for 30 years with very
> limited success
>
>
> According to https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html, it loo
Before this conversation forked off in a direction I didn't want it to go,
I'd like to thank everyone, privately and publicly, that gave me a hint as
to the distribution of /25s and greater in their networks.
I was at the time, trying to get "libreqos.io" to crack the 32k customer
barrier, which w
A small plane crashed into high-voltage transmission power lines in
Montgomery County, Maryland; near Washington DC. Most of the data centers
are in Northern Virginia, but some are in Southern Maryland (Wheaton,
Olney, Gaithersburg and as far away as Silver Spring).
https://wtop.com/montg
> On 24 Nov 2022, at 19:53, Abraham Y. Chen wrote:
>
> Dear Joe:
>
> 0) Allow me to share my understanding of the two topics that you brought up.
>
> 1) "... https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html, it looks like
> we’ve gone from ~0% to ~40% in 12 years ": Your numbers may
I use a web plugin tool called ipvfoo to track my actual ipv4 vis ipv6
usage. I wish it worked over time. With very few exceptions I am still
regularly calling ipv4 addresses in most webpages. Has anyone done a
more organized study of say, the top 1 million, and how many still
require at least some
I use the same extension on Chrome.
I'm surprised that with all the recent hoopla about it, from the major
social media platforms, Twitter still shows serving their http site over
IPv4, Facebook and LinkedIn show solid IPv6.
-J
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 9:29 PM Dave Taht wrote:
> I use a web pl
Dear Guru(s),
My apologies upfront if this question has already been asked.
If that’s the case, please kindly point me to the solution|thread so that
the mailing list bandwidth is not wasted.
Situation:
On one of our prefixes, we are detecting continuous “BGP AS-Path Changes”
in the order of 1,0
I don't think this is normal, I think this is a fault and needs to be
addressed. There should be significant reachability problems, because
rerouting isn't neither immediate, nor lock-step with SW+HW nor
synchronous between nodes.
What exactly needs to be done, I can't tell without looking at the
9 matches
Mail list logo
