On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 4:57 PM Mark Andrews wrote:
> > On 5 Jun 2023, at 06:19, William Herrin wrote:
> > At an absolute minimum there's an impact to confidentiality since it
> > causes
> I don’t see a big risk here.
Hi Mark,
I agree. CVEs are nevertheless issued for security problems where
On Sat 2023-06-03 23:00:33+0200 Terrence wrote:
> Forgive me if I'm missing something obvious, but why are you
> renumbering at all?
>
> Of course the diversification of RIRs is a good thing, but couldn't
> that be accomplished just as well by transferring the current
> allocation to LACNIC?
Hi
On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 04:17:41PM -0700, William Herrin wrote:
> It *is* a security update. That's a really great point that I
> completely missed. After some period of time, the folks running
> b.root-servers.net should file a CVE against implementations still
> using the deprecated IP address.
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 8:46 PM Matt Corallo wrote:
> On 6/3/23 4:17 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> > It *is* a security update. After some period of time, the folks running
> > b.root-servers.net should file a CVE against implementations still
> > using the deprecated IP address.
>
> Not really sure
4 matches
Mail list logo
