On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 8:35 PM wrote:
> Or has no engineer capable of configuring it, or support staff trained to
> handle the issues that will come up.
Like I said: lazy. Training to deploy and support a minimalist 6rd
deployment where customers who want it can optionally use it is not a
challe
On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 2:30 AM Stephen Satchell wrote:
>
> On 12/1/23 5:27 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> > It would be better to keep the government out of it altogether, but that
> > has little chance of happening.
> >
>
> I agree. But I do have a question: is there a Best Practices RFC for
> setti
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 6:21 PM Tom Samplonius wrote:
>
>
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ADByjakzQXCj9Re_pUvrb5Qe5OK-QmhlYRLMBY4vH4/edit
> >
> > Us bufferbloat folk have been putting together a response to the FCC's
> > NOI (notice of inquiry) asking for feedback as to increasing the
> >
On 11/30/23 20:55, o...@delong.com wrote:
For the most part out here, if it’s going behind sheetrock,
contractors/electricians just run Romex or whatever in bare stud holes
without any form of conduit.
The nice thing about ENT (or other corrugated plastic conduit) from a
residential electrici
On 12/1/23 05:18, Josh Luthman wrote:
Keep in mind new construction versus having to get around drywall.
Rigid conduit is great if you can get it. If you can, by all means go
for it!
However, if the outside utility aggregation point is not pretty much on
the other side of the wall from the
On 12/2/23 11:59, Brandon Martin wrote:
On 12/1/23 05:18, Josh Luthman wrote:
Keep in mind new construction versus having to get around drywall.
Rigid conduit is great if you can get it. If you can, by all means go
for it!
Rigid conduit is essentially galvanized plumbing pipe. Very rare in
On 12/2/23 15:09, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Rigid conduit is essentially galvanized plumbing pipe. Very rare in new
construction other than for overhead electrical service entrance. It's
extremely heavy and difficult to work with. As its name suggests, it's
quite rigid. Not easily bent or cut and nee
What I've found missing were references to packet loss impact on
performance. It seems to assume cable/fiber environments with little
to no packet loss, while Wi-Fi and 3G/4G/5G are not like that.
Rubens
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 7:23 AM Dave Taht wrote:
>
> Over here:
>
> https://docs.google.com
On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 5:04 PM Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> What I've found missing were references to packet loss impact on
> performance. It seems to assume cable/fiber environments with little
> to no packet loss, while Wi-Fi and 3G/4G/5G are not like that.
Wireless environments tend to do L2 retrans
9 matches
Mail list logo
