Hello,
On Tue, 22 May 2018 06:35:12 +0100
Martin Hepworth wrote:
> I'll put this as a starter
>
> http://submarine-cable-map-2018.telegeography.com/
This one is rather cool too:
http://he.net/3d-map/
Paul
--
Paul RollandE-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
CTO - Witbe
Hello,
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 16:26:13 +0100
Marty Strong via NANOG wrote:
> So far we know about a few CPEs which answer for 1.1.1.1 themselves:
>
> - Pace 5268
> - Calix GigaCenter
> - Various Cisco Wifi access points
>
> If you know of others please send them my way so we can investigate.
It
Hello,
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:21:40 +0200
Marco Paesani wrote:
> No solution
> http://heartbeat.skype.com/2015/09/skype_presence_issues.html
Back for me (France): presence updated. Using Skype on Linux
Paul
pgpB6P6t2698f.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello,
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:37:32 +0100
James Bensley wrote:
> On 14 September 2015 at 09:27, Job Snijders wrote:
> > Geoff, if nobody objects, would you be willing to send out IPv6 reports
> > too? Or maybe it would make sense to merge the IPv4 and IPv6 data in a
> > single report so it is e
Hello,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:56:02 -0600
Michael McConnell wrote:
> As the IPv4 space get smaller and smaller, does anyone think we'll see a
> time when /25's will be accepted for global BGP prefix announcement. The
> current smallest size is a /24 and generally ok for most people, but the
> cr
Hello,
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:24:00 -0500
chip wrote:
> I have an application that needs to gather BGP RIB data from the routers
> that connect to all of our upstream providers. Basically I need to know
> all the routes available from a particular provider. Currently I'm
> gathering this dat
Hello,
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:14:18 +0100
Tomas Podermanski wrote:
> It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very first
> time when native IPv6 on google statistics
> (http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some
> might say it is tremendous success aft
Hello,
On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:43:41 -0500
"STARNES, CURTIS" wrote:
> I guess I will just have to settle for selling my 224.0.0.0/24 :-<
>
After checking some machines, it seems that 127.0.0.1/8 can be sold multiple
times, as it is fully re-usable.
Any bonus for that ?
Paul
signature.
Hello,
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:52:21 +
Nick Hilliard wrote:
> I'd be quite interested in seeing the MTTR for a sub-ice cable break which
> happened in late october.
Maybe that's the reason they want to build three with different paths ;)
Paul
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 14:30:47 +0100
Olivier CALVANO wrote:
> anyone have contact of a operator (CHina Telecom ? CPC ?) that can provide
> L2 Link
> from China to Singapor or if not direct link, China to Hong Kong.
PCCW ?
Paul
--
TelcoTV Awards 2011 - Witbe winner in "Innovation in Test
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:48:03 -0400 (EDT)
"Ben Carleton" wrote:
> That one would be good for a firewall/IDS setup... "Oh rats, our attack
> was stopped by a firewall at... HEY!" :-D
::b19:b00b:babe:101 ? :)
Sure, that would be funny !
Paul
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Patrick,
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:22:37 -0400
"Patrick W. Gilmore" wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2009, at 6:00 PM, cidr-rep...@potaroo.net wrote:
>
> > Recent Table History
> >Date PrefixesCIDR Agg
> >24-07-09298785 182835
> >25-07-09299168 182751
> >
Hello,
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:37:59 -0500
Pete Templin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of my customers, a host at 64.8.105.15, is feeling a "bonus"
> ~130kpps from 88.191.63.28. I've null-routed the source, though our
> Engine2 GE cards don't seem to be doing a proper job of that,
> unfortun
13 matches
Mail list logo
