On 24 Sep 2012, at 17:57, Tore Anderson tore.ander...@redpill-linpro.com
wrote:
* Tore Anderson
I would pay very close attention to MAP/4RD.
FYI, Mark Townsley had a great presentation about MAP at RIPE65 today,
it's 35 minutes you won't regret spending:
On 24 Sep 2012, at 22:42, Mike Jones m...@mikejones.in wrote:
While you could do something similar without the encapsulation this
would require that every router on your network support routing on
port numbers,
Well, not really. As the video pointed out, the system was designed to
leverage
On 17 Sep 2012, at 13:28, John Mitchell mi...@illuminati.org wrote:
snip
Given that the first 3 bits of a public IPv6 address are always 001, giving
/48 allocations to customers means that service providers will only have
2^(48-3) or 2^45 allocations of /48 to hand out to a population
Hi,
On 17 Sep 2012, at 15:02, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 17/09/2012 14:37, Adrian Bool wrote:
It seems a tad unfair that the bottom 80 bits are squandered away with a
utilisation rate of something closely approximating zero
You are thinking in ipv4 mode. In ipv6 mode
Hi Mike,
On 17 Sep 2012, at 16:04, Mike Simkins mike.simk...@sungard.com wrote:
RIPE 552 (I think), allows you to request up to a /29 without additional
justification if needed.
Sure, but you're just tinkering at the edges here.
32-bits would be a more sensible allocation size to LIRs,
On 13 Jul 2012, at 17:11, Tom Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:05 AM, TJ trej...@gmail.com wrote:
As an IPv6 newbie myself, I wonder how hosts handle link local, ULA and
global addresses.
For example, if you have some internal web traffic used for intranet use
only, do you bind
6 matches
Mail list logo
