Re: Drop cable

sorry I forgot to mention the model: drop cable 6 core fiber optic GYXTW 1Km/ drum in I am using this model too: drop fiber cable 2 core G657A2 fiber & 1.2mm self-supporting steel & LSZH Regards, > On Sep 21, 2017, at 11:08 AM, ahmed.dala...@hrins.net >

A10 sales representative

Anyone out here from A10 sales representative for MEA region please contact me off list. Regards,

CGNAT

Hi, Any recommendation regarding CGNAT appliance who try it and which brand is the best from his perspective! The throughput which I want to pass through the CGNAT is about 40Gbits and number of subscribers are about 40,000 subscribers. Regards, Ahmed

Re: Nat

Hello, Does anyone use Citrix Netscaler MPX 14000 as a CGNAT for more than 25K users? Regards,

CDN

Dear All, Does anyone know if AWS amazon “cloudfront”, cloud flare, Microsoft … etc, hosting their servers on other party providers? just like what GGC and Akamai do by hosting their servers on other ISP’s datacenter! Regards,

Re: Nat

> 2015 fall term was about 27k concurrently active devices, 4.6Gbps, 415kpps. > > The ASR1000 would have been our other choice but the ASR's higher price > pushed us toward A10. > > Eriks > --- > Eriks Rugelis > Sr. Consultant > Netidea Inc. > T: +1.416.8

Re: Nat

> On Dec 17, 2015, at 8:47 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > On 17/12/2015 17:36, Ahmed Munaf wrote: >> we are using ESP 20 > > You haven't said what you mean by "better". This could mean "faster" or > "copes with more sessions" or &qu

Re: Nat

anog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ahmed Munaf > Sent: Thursday, 17 December 2015 5:36 AM > To: Mark Tinka > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Nat > > In addition to the limited concurrent sessions for ASR1000, we are facing > some issue with many users how are playing online games! Nat problems! > > Ahmed, > >

Re: Nat

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > On 16/Dec/15 18:36, Ahmed Munaf wrote: > >> In addition to the limited concurrent sessions for ASR1000, we are >> facing some issue with many users how are playing online games! Nat >> problems!

Re: Nat

In addition to the limited concurrent sessions for ASR1000, we are facing some issue with many users how are playing online games! Nat problems! Ahmed, > On Dec 16, 2015, at 7:22 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > On 16/Dec/15 12:45, Ahmed Munaf wrote: > >> Yes, we a

Re: Nat

e using a Cisco what for NAT? And which products are you considering? > > On Tuesday, December 15, 2015, Ahmed Munaf <mailto:ahmed.dala...@hrins.net>> wrote: > Dear All, > > We are using cisco for natting, we'd like to change it to another brand like > A10 or Cit

Nat

Dear All, We are using cisco for natting, we'd like to change it to another brand like A10 or Citrix. Please any advice regarding the three brands and what are the advantages and disadvantages for each one? Regards,