On Thu 29 Oct 2020 02:10:25 GMT, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> I tried deleting the rule and it drops the traffic completely. So DNS
> resolution stops working and I am unsure why. It's not like default drop or
> anything. I can edit the rule and whatever active port 53 related rule is
> there works. But
On Thu 22 Apr 2021 01:24:54 GMT, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote:
> One example is
> http://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_detail/lg01/ipv6?q=2a0b:6b86:d15::/48
>
> 2a0b:6b86:d15::/48 via:
> BGP.as_path: 204092 57199 35280 6939 42615 42615 212232
> BGP.as_path: 208627 207910 57199 3528
On Thu 12 Aug 2021 15:27:48 GMT, Steve McManus wrote:
> PeeringDB is looking at participating at an upcoming NANOG Hackathon.
> One of the ideas for a theme is to improve the API. Specifically by
> adding API calls for common use cases that people need to handle
> outside of the API. Typically, by
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQ5MA685ApE
On Wed 02 Sep 2020 20:40:35 GMT, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> That is what the 5G router is for...
>
> ons. 2. sep. 2020 19.47 skrev Michael Hallgren :
>
> > While conserving connectivity? 😂
> >
> >
> > --
> > *De :* Shawn L via
Hi,
You can build it yourself, see
https://github.com/nttgin/BGPalerter#more-information-for-developers
I think that the binaries are here for thoses that don’t want to install
all the build-chain.
--
Alarig
On 14/08/2019 19:06, Ryan Hamel wrote:
> Job,
>
> I appreciate the effort and the inte
Hi,
On lun. 4 nov. 10:55:47 2019, Chris Knipe wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Except for the email on ARIN's details, does anyone else have a contact for
> the DoD?
>
> We are experiencing a situation with a 3rd party (direct peer), wanting to
> advertise DoD address space to us, and we need to confirm w
On 04/11/2019 10:23, Chris Knipe wrote:
> I know that much - but just because it's not advertised, doesn't mean
> you're allowed to use it?
It means that you’re not supposed to advertise it to your peers, at least.
The usage of public-but-not-used space inside networks isn’t really my
problem a
On Fri Nov 13 04:27:36 2015, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
> I'll have to research how other countries tried to implement similar
> schemes (I believe the UK has with some of the popular torrent sites.
>
> I know the Australian attempt to filter porn failed miserably.
We also have some torrent sites
On Tue Dec 1 14:39:14 2015, Andrew Kirch wrote:
> Might I suggest cake pleas?
You mean
http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Hurricane-Cake.jpg
?
--
Alarig
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-
Alarig Le Lay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon Mar 7 15:51:06 2016, Owen DeLong wrote:
> To the best of my knowledge, Windows actually generates three
> addresses…
>
> 1. Subnet Stable quasi-randomized address unrelated (or at least not
> reversable to) MAC address.
> 2. Privacy address which rotates frequently (for some definition of
On Fri Jul 1 17:43:21 2016, Gary Wardell wrote:
> >
> > http://ipv6excuses.com/
>
> That website only supports IPv4.
It’s on your side.
alarig@pikachu ~ % telnet ipv6excuses.com http
Trying 2403:7000:8000:500::26...
Connected to ipv6excuses.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
^]
telnet> quit
Connec
Hi,
On Wed Jan 18 21:25:23 2017, Gert Doering via Outages wrote:
> Trying to query directly, ns1/ns2.ntp.org return SERVFAIL as well,
> and ns1/ns2.everett.org do not reply at all... so pure guesswork on
> my side says "the original set is broken / under attack / ..., so
> new servers have been ad
On sam. 25 févr. 09:49:56 2017, Aaron wrote:
> Hi, I'm new to the nanog list, hope this isn't out of scope for what is
> usually discussed here.
>
>
>
> Cogent is telling me that I can't route through cogent to get to google ipv6
> routes (particularly the well known dns addresses 2001:4860:486
On jeu. 2 mars 12:36:04 2017, Aaron Gould wrote:
> Well, I asked my (3) upstream providers to only send me a ipv6 default
> route and they sent me ::/0...here's one of them...
Why did you don’t ask for a full view? With that, you can easily deal
with that kind of problem.
--
alarig
signature
On lun. 6 mars 10:55:18 2017, Brandon Applegate wrote:
> Just did a whois on the documentation prefix and was surprised to see what
> looks like a user object registered for it:
>
> % Information related to '2001:0DB8::/32AS132111'
>
> route6: 2001:0DB8::/32
> descr: FUTURE D S
On sam. 25 févr. 09:49:56 2017, Aaron wrote:
> Hi, I'm new to the nanog list, hope this isn't out of scope for what is
> usually discussed here.
>
>
>
> Cogent is telling me that I can't route through cogent to get to google ipv6
> routes (particularly the well known dns addresses 2001:4860:486
On mer. 8 mars 09:29:11 2017, Marty Strong via NANOG wrote:
> I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s unwanted, where Telstra domestic is
> announcing to Telstra International, who in turn announces to Cogent.
I wouldn’t too, especially since I don’t see it anymore:
alarig@nominoe:~ % birdc6 show route
On jeu. 23 mars 11:35:05 2017, LHC (k9m) wrote:
> Many people still don't have native IPv6. Why must 6XS die?
The whole reflection is explained here: https://www.sixxs.net/sunset/ but
to abstract, it’s because SixXS became an argument for large provider to
not deploy IPv6 to their end users, as th
On dim. 14 mai 09:29:45 2017, Eric Germann wrote:
> Good morning all,
>
> I’m looking for some guidance on best practices to secure IPv6 on
> Linux end nodes parked in AWS.
>
> Boxes will be running various services (DNS for starters) and I’m
> looking to secure mainly ICMP at this point. Servic
On Thu 04 Jul 2024 18:16:28 GMT, Randy Bush wrote:
> hak whacked me to add
> http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/nagios-plugins/check_zone_rrsig_expiration.html
> to my nagios deployment.
>
> anyone have some known sick in various ways dns zones against which to
> test?
Those domains are bro
21 matches
Mail list logo
