omas Hlavacek, Fraunhofer SIT
> > Yossi Gilad, MIT
> >
> > [A] https://conferences.sigcomm.org/hotnets/2018/program.html
> > [B] http://peering.usc.edu
> > [C] https://goo.gl/AFR1Cn
> > [D]
> https://labs.ripe.net/Members/erik/ripe-ncc-and-duke-university-bgp-experiment
> > [E] https://goo.gl/nJhmx1
>
--
Ben Cooper
Chief Executive Officer
PacketGG - Multicast
M(Telstra): 0410 411 301
M(Optus): 0434 336 743
E: b...@packet.gg & b...@multicast.net.au
W: https://packet.gg
W: https://multicast.net.au
I've deployed PowerDNS before, along with PowerAdmin
(https://www.poweradmin.org/trac/). Very easy to set up and manage.
Ben
For system or network support, please email supp...@hns.net
Curtis Maurand wrote:
Check out www.powerdns.com as an alternative to bind. Its faster, more
secure, does
of thousands of records with dnsmadeeasy
and we're getting ready to bring it all in house, and powerdns/poweradmin
looks like the solution we've been looking for.
-brandon
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Ben Cooper b...@hns.net wrote:
I've deployed PowerDNS before, along with PowerAdmin
If you want to go down the BIND route, I'd recommend using xname as a
frontend (http://source.xname.org/).
Paul E wrote:
cmaurand Check out www.powerdns.com as an alternative to bind. Its
cmaurand faster, more secure, does IPV6 and easier to maintain.
This is purely opinion.
BIND has
4 matches
Mail list logo
