Re: Did I miss a problem: FCC and CISA stress need for access during pandemic

Good question - Of the listed “key points” the first and second, regarding designation as essential employees, has been explicitly included in the several state and county orders that I’ve personally read. By no means a complete survey, but at least some locales are aware of the issue. The only o

Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election

To many (or most) of the people participating in this thread - I enjoy watching flame wars as much - perhaps more - than the next person... But please keep in mind the NANOG mailing list guidelines at https://www.nanog.org/resources/usage-guidelines/ as well as the Code of Conduct that's included

Re: FCC grants WISPs temporary 5.9 GHz spectrum access

Indeed, this does seem like good news under the current situation. It's good for users, and it's nice PR for both the FCC and the WISPs. But I'm curious: What do these 33 operators anticipate after the STA expires in 60 days? Obviously their plans may need to adjust depending on the pandemic respo

Re: Oct. 3, 2018 EAS Presidential Alert test

Hi, Andy. I don't have a helpful answer for you, because I'm at the NANOG meeting in Canada right now and as far as I could tell none of the attendees' phones alerted. But I am curious if perhaps your office has a micro-cell for AT&T, or something like that, which might have caused different behav

Re: ARIN RPKI TAL deployment issues

Hi, John. On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 22:56 John Curran wrote: > > Indeed - In the process of complying with a different legal environment, > ARIN sometimes has to behave differently than RIRs that are located > elsewhere... > > [...] > > The significant difference for ARIN is that we operate under a