RE: why not AS number based prefixes aggregation

>-Original Message- >From: Paul Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:31 PM >To: Ricardo Oliveira; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: why not AS number based prefixes aggregation > > >This thread begs an interesting question: what is the right >amount of gran

RE: Revealed: The Internet's well known BGP behavior

We've encountered the same diligence with LVL3, especially after acquisitions where records haven't been updated yet. Although a little annoying it's quite refreshing. >-Original Message- >From: Eric Spaeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 1:41 AM >To: Jon Lew

RE: interger to I P address

>>> The harder way: >>> >>> Decimal: 1089055123 >>> Hex (dashes inserted at octals): 40-E9-A9-93 Decimal (of >each octet): >>> 64-233-169-147 IP Address: 64.233.169.147 >> >> The Python way >> >> >>> import socket, struct >> >>> socket.inet_ntoa(struct.pack('>l', 1089055123)) >> '64.233.169.147'