> On 19 Oct 2019, at 04:42, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 20:15, Lukas Tribus wrote:
>
>> This has the potential to brake things, because it requires symmetry
>> and perfect IRR accuracy. Just because the prefix would be rejected by
>> BGP does not mean there is not a legitimat
On 16 Apr 2020, at 22:35, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 15/Apr/20 19:07, Saku Ytti wrote:
>>
>>
>> Don't run Cisco ORR RR or have IGP next-hops :/
>
> Does it break NEXT_HOP=self in Cisco-land?
>
> Mark.
We’re testing ORR at the moment as part of core upgrades (XRv on ESXi), and
next-ho
2 matches
Mail list logo