If anyone has any experiences they'd be willing to share, or even lab reports,
on HP A6600, it would be helpful. I believe this is the same product as H3C
SR6600.
We're being asked to "look at" A6604 facing our IPv4/IPv6 transit. I'd like to
get some opinions before I go through effort of get
On Jun 11, 2011, at 19:00, TR Shaw wrote:
> I'm not sure where this thread is going but rural america and rural canada
> are rolling their own broadband connectivity in places.
This is my eventual goal where I'm moving. (Oswego Co., NY).
I'm well aware that I'm moving outside of "broadband-lan
On Jun 19, 2011, at 4:16 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
>>
> Anybody got draft language for a SLA clause that requires routing 'at least
> one hop _past_ the provider's network edge' for every AS visible at major
> public peering points and/or LookingGlass sites?
This is relevant to my interests. I'd
On Jun 20, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Jon Lewis wrote:
> internet connectivity, and that much $ is at stake, you're stupid if you
> don't have some redundancy. Nothing works all the time forever.
I can't consider Cogent even a redundant link, since I need two other
upstreams to reach the Internet redu
Can someone from Bluehost/Hostmonster contact me off list. One of your
customers has complained to me that they cannot send mail to us.
We've done some testing, and it seems it works to mailservers with
only A records, but breaks with mailservers with both A and . (As
in, we never even see a de
Is it common in the industry for a colocation provider, when requested to put
an egress ACL facing us such as:
deny udp any a.b.c.d/24 eq 80
…to refuse and tell us we must subscribe to their managed DDOS product?
-cjp
On Oct 25, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Brandon Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Keegan Holley
> wrote:
>
>> Depends on the provider. Many just do not want to manage hundreds of
>>
> Conversely, some don't want to be paid for bare colocation (at bare
> colocation prices) and have to th
I'm writing a LOA/CFA doc for some DS1s to be delivered to us on a
Verizon private OC12 ring, and I'm getting conflicting info (including
from multiple people within Verizon) on how to address individual
DS1s. For STS/DS3s, it's pretty obvious, just the STS number, i.e.
/OC12///
Anyone know for c
On Jan 24, 2011, at 13:37, "Matthew S. Crocker"
wrote:
> Wouldn't you map the DS1 to the M13 mux that is connected to the STS1 on the
> OC? I didn't think Verizon did DS1 level xconnects directly into SONET.
It's a Flashwave 4100, I'm told it has an integrated DS1 mux. (It's
not on the prem her
We saw multiple 110V power feeds drop simultaneously yesterday at
SAVVIS DC3, around 10am EDT. Anyone else have an issue, or is someone
just playing with our breakers? We didn't lose any of our 208V.
-cjp
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Michael Dillon
wrote:
> So we should CONDONE such borrowing and recommend a couple of /8s to
> use in North America. Perhaps one could be DOD for those operators
> that do not carry any DOD traffic and one could be that /8 from
> Softbank Japan, 126/8 if I recall i
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:24 PM, wrote:
> NOTE WELL - Just because -you- (for values of you) see no value in
> space assigned, does NOT give you the right to hijack said space
> for your own purposes. Nor does it look well for you to advocate
> hijacking someone els
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> You just need to move up in frequency a bit. My slowest ham-band link runs at
> 12 Mbps and my fastest at over 100 Mbps.
>
> Good reminder that I should renumber the IPv4 portion of that network to
> somewhere in 44.0.0.0/8 however.
What
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
> Nope, mostly HF (under 30mhz) gear at 300baud. Yes, you read that right.
You are running IP on this? And I though 1200 bauds half duplex was slow.
14 matches
Mail list logo
