>
>
>
> > I'm just saying it's one valid
> > security issue with using any sort of globally unique IP address (v4
> > or v6), in that analyzing a bunch of traffic from a particular
> > netblock would allow one to build a topology map. It's easier with
> > IPv6 since you can presume most if not all
> But none of this does what NAT does for a big enterprise, which is
> to *hide internal topology*. Yes, addressing the privacy concerns
> that come from using lower-64-bits-derived-from-MAC-address is
> required, but it is also necessary (for some organizations) to
> make it impossible to tell tha
ers. I'm just
having to deal with more problems that don't have valid solutions today.
Clue
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Dave Israel wrote:
>
> Clue Store wrote:
> > Well you and the rest of these so called "dreamers" can help with the
> > purchase of my n
Well you and the rest of these so called "dreamers" can help with the
purchase of my new routers that don't exist yet to support you wanting to
multi-home a /29 and have the rest of the Internet world hold all of these
said /29's in their tables. Most folks who get a /29's don't care how they
get t
>
>
>
> Blocking port 25 is not, IMHO, a violation of Network Neutrality. I
> explained why in a very long, probably boring, post. Your definition of
> Network neutrality may differ. Which is fine, but doesn't make mine wrong.
>
>
>
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick
>
>
> I agree with this. I would think t
>Since the goal for this initial wave is to make IPv6 available to
>those who request it or have a need for it, we feel its acceptable
>that there will need to be some user participation in enabling IPv6
>for a host.
To me, from a small ISP perspective, this is where the largest delima is
what
Mine's rebooted at leat 3 times a day sine the upgrade :(
What ever happened to quality control
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2152619&tstart=0
Yes, I absolutely love the /24 filtering "everybody" does. Internet
littering at its best.
http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-badpfx-nos
Clue
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, ML wrote:
>
> I received an alert from Cyclops telling me a probe in AS51
> Am I alone in my view that BGP is _far_ more simple and
> straight-forward than OSPF
>that ospf has become exceedingly complex, and all that results thereof.
I couldn't agree more. Most of my staff are still under the impression in
Cisco land that the "network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0" statement
nt when they ask why I decide to go
ebgp.
And yes Philip, I actually have many of those presentations saved on my
drive as they were all for not ;)
Once again, thanks all for the replies.
Clue
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Philip Smith wrote:
> Clue Store said the following on 20/8/09 01:1
, but this is not the point of my message to the list, as
I am more concerned about customer connections.
Keep the opinions coming guys.
Clue
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 19/08/2009 16:12, Clue Store wrote:
>
>> I would like to run an IGP (currently
Sorry, not OSPFv3. IPv6 thoughts dancing in my head. OSPF-VRF as most of you
probably interpret.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Clue Store wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I know this has been discussed probably many times on this list, but I was
> looking for some specifics about what othe
Hi All,
I know this has been discussed probably many times on this list, but I was
looking for some specifics about what others are doing in the following
situations.
I would like to run an IGP (currently OSPF) to our customers that are
multi-homed in a non-mpls environment. They are multi-homed
Could someone from Akamai support unicast me off list please?? I have tried
the usual support emails and numbers which usually have great response, but
am having an issue getting someone to help me with an services problem.
Sorry for the noise
TIA
Max
009 at 12:55 PM, Kaegler, Mike wrote:
> We last went through this 30 days ago.
> http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg17619.html
> -porkchop
>
>
> On 5/29/09 1:50 PM, "Clue Store" wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > I am having a hell of a time trying to figure out
Hi All,
I am having a hell of a time trying to figure out who it is I need to
contact to get this fixed. I just got a new /21 allocation from ARIN and am
announcing it with no issues. I can ping anywhere and the planet can see me.
The issue I am having is that when I surf out on this new allocation
16 matches
Mail list logo
